IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1354-d734138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physical Therapists and Physical Therapist Assistants’ Knowledge and Use of the STEADI for Falls Risk Screening of Older Adults in Physical Therapy Practice in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer L. Vincenzo

    (Department of Physical Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA)

  • Lori A. Schrodt

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC 28723, USA)

  • Colleen Hergott

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA)

  • Subashan Perera

    (Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA)

  • Jennifer Tripken

    (Center for Healthy Aging, National Council on Aging, Washington, DC 22202, USA)

  • Tiffany E. Shubert

    (UNC Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA)

  • Jennifer S. Brach

    (Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA)

Abstract

Fall-risk screening and prevention is within the scope of physical-therapy practice. Prior research indicates United States-based physical therapists (PTs) and physical-therapist assistants (PTAs) use the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s STEADI (Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries) toolkit for community-based fall-risk screenings of older adults. However, clinically based fall-risk screenings and knowledge and use of the STEADI by PTs and PTAs is unknown. We conducted a cross-sectional survey distributed to a convenience sample of PTs and PTAs in the United States through email blasts and social media. PTs and PTAs (N = 425) who responded to the survey and worked in clinical settings with older adults were included. Eighty-nine percent of respondents reported conducting clinical fall-risk screening. Approximately 51% were ‘familiar’ to ‘very familiar’ with the STEADI, and 21.7% of the overall sample were not familiar at all. Only 26.1% utilize the STEADI for clinical fall-risk screening. Of the respondents who were ‘very familiar’ with the STEADI ( n = 132, 31.1%), 84.1% ( n = 111) reported using the STEADI in clinical practice. Seventy-six percent of respondents who use the STEADI implemented it by choice even though the majority (52.1%, n = 63) did not have it embedded in their documentation/workflow. Some PTs/PTAs can and do manage falls using the STEADI, but there is a gap in knowledge and use of the STEADI for falls management among PTs and PTAs in the United States. Further research is needed to identify the tools PTs use for multifactorial-fall screening and management and the impact of PTs’ use of the STEADI on patient outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer L. Vincenzo & Lori A. Schrodt & Colleen Hergott & Subashan Perera & Jennifer Tripken & Tiffany E. Shubert & Jennifer S. Brach, 2022. "Physical Therapists and Physical Therapist Assistants’ Knowledge and Use of the STEADI for Falls Risk Screening of Older Adults in Physical Therapy Practice in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1354-:d:734138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1354/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1354/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1354-:d:734138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.