IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1324-d733096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Assessment of Prolonged Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blockade for Postoperative Analgesia in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery by a Perineural Addition of Dexamethasone to 0.5% Ropivacaine: A Randomized Comparison Study

Author

Listed:
  • Simona Stojanović

    (Department of Oral Surgery, School of Medicine and Stomatology, University of Niš, 18101 Niš, Serbia)

  • Nikola Burić

    (Department of Oral Surgery, School of Medicine and Stomatology, University of Niš, 18101 Niš, Serbia)

  • Milos Tijanić

    (Department of Oral Surgery, School of Medicine and Stomatology, University of Niš, 18101 Niš, Serbia)

  • Kosta Todorović

    (Department of Oral Surgery, School of Medicine and Stomatology, University of Niš, 18101 Niš, Serbia)

  • Kristina Burić

    (School of Medicine, University of Niš, 18101 Niš, Serbia)

  • Nina Burić

    (School of Medicine, University of Niš, 18101 Niš, Serbia)

  • Marija Jovanović

    (School of Medicine, University of Niš, 18101 Niš, Serbia)

  • Vukadin Bajagić

    (School of Medicine, University of Podgorica, 81110 Podgorica, Montenegro)

Abstract

Background: Perineurally adding dexamethasone to local anesthetics could enable postoperative analgesia. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy of 4 mg dexamethasone and 0.5% ropivacaine on the prolonged duration of mandibular anesthesia for postoperative analgesia during third molar surgery. Materials and method: The patients of both sexes, and in the age range of 17 to 50 yrs of age, received the Gow-Gates anesthesia. Group I received 4 mL of plain 0.5% ropivacaine, with perineurally added 1 mL/4 mg of dexamethasone; group II received 4 mL of plain 0.5% ropivacaine with perineurally added 1 mL of 0.9% saline; group III received 4 mL of plain 0.5 bupivacaine with perineurally added 1 mL of 0.9% saline. The prime anesthesia outcome was the duration of conduction anesthesia (DCA); the secondary outcome was the duration of analgesia (DAN) and analgesia before analgesic intake. Results: In 45 randomly selected subjects (mean age 27.06 ± 8.20), DCA was statistically longest in group I ( n = 15) (592.50 ± 161.75 min, p = 0.001), collated with groups II ( n = 15) and III ( n = 15) (307.40 ± 84.71 and 367.07 ± 170.52 min, respectively). DAN was significantly the longest in group I (mean: 654.9 ± 198.4 min, p = 0.001), compared with group II (345.4 ± 88.0 min) and group III (413.7 ± 152.3 min), with insignificant adverse reactions. One-third of the operated patients absented from the use of analgesics. Conclusion: A amount 0.5% ropivacaine with dexamethasone usefully served as an analgesic with a success rate of 93.4% of the given anesthesia.

Suggested Citation

  • Simona Stojanović & Nikola Burić & Milos Tijanić & Kosta Todorović & Kristina Burić & Nina Burić & Marija Jovanović & Vukadin Bajagić, 2022. "The Assessment of Prolonged Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blockade for Postoperative Analgesia in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery by a Perineural Addition of Dexamethasone to 0.5% Ropivacaine: A Randomized C," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1324-:d:733096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1324/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1324/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gongyi Zhang & Yu Liu & Arnold E. Ruoho & James H. Hurley, 1997. "Erratum: Structure of the adenylyl cyclase catalytic core," Nature, Nature, vol. 388(6638), pages 204-204, July.
    2. Gongyi Zhang & Yu Liu & Arnold E. Ruoho & James H. Hurley, 1997. "Structure of the adenylyl cyclase catalytic core," Nature, Nature, vol. 386(6622), pages 247-253, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1324-:d:733096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.