IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1157-d729570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“When I Don’t Have a Cigarette It’s Helpful, but It Really Don’t Satisfy:” Qualitative Study of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) Use among Low-Income Smokers

Author

Listed:
  • Claire A. Spears

    (Department of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Dina M. Jones

    (Center for the Study of Tobacco, Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA)

  • Cherell Cottrell-Daniels

    (Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Division of Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33617, USA)

  • Hala Elahi

    (Department of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Courtney Strosnider

    (Department of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Jackie Luong

    (Department of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Scott R. Weaver

    (Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Terry F. Pechacek

    (Department of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among low-income adult cigarette smokers, who experience severe tobacco-related health disparities. Methods: This study conducted interviews to examine experiences and perceptions associated with ENDS use among predominantly low-income adult smokers ( n = 30; mean age 30.2 ± 12.9; 60% male, 46.7% African American, 30% white, 10% more than one race; 76.7% annual household income ≤USD 24,000). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded in NVivo 11. Results: Overall, participants reported complementing rather than substituting their smoking with ENDS use (e.g., using ENDS only when smoking is not allowed). Predominant reasons for vaping were convenience, smoking reduction/cessation, stress management, social acceptability, lower long-term costs than smoking, and appealing flavors. Common reasons for not switching to exclusive vaping were that ENDS did not satisfy cigarette cravings and concerns about ENDS health effects. Participants indicated higher likelihood of switching to exclusive ENDS use if the products were more affordable, perceived as substantially less harmful, tasted and felt more like smoking a cigarette, and more effective for reducing cravings. Conclusions: Continued research is needed to maximize any harm reduction potential of ENDS and ensure that these products do not contribute to worsening health disparities.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire A. Spears & Dina M. Jones & Cherell Cottrell-Daniels & Hala Elahi & Courtney Strosnider & Jackie Luong & Scott R. Weaver & Terry F. Pechacek, 2022. "“When I Don’t Have a Cigarette It’s Helpful, but It Really Don’t Satisfy:” Qualitative Study of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) Use among Low-Income Smokers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1157-:d:729570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1157/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1157/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1157-:d:729570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.