IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1050-d727481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility, Interrater Reliability and Internal Consistency of the German Environmental Audit Tool (G-EAT)

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Fahsold

    (Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen e.V. Standort Witten, 58453 Witten, Germany
    Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany)

  • Kathrin Schmüdderich

    (Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen e.V. Standort Witten, 58453 Witten, Germany
    Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany)

  • Hilde Verbeek

    (Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Bernhard Holle

    (Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen e.V. Standort Witten, 58453 Witten, Germany
    Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany)

  • Rebecca Palm

    (Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany)

Abstract

Dementia-specific environmental design has the potential to positively influence capabilities for daily living and quality of life in people with dementia living in nursing homes. To date, no reliable instrument exists for systematically assessing the adequacy of these built environments in Germany. This study aimed to test the adapted version of the Environmental Audit Tool—High Care (EAT-HC)—the German Environmental Audit Tool (G-EAT)—with regard to its feasibility, interrater reliability and internal consistency. The G-EAT was applied as a paper-pencil version in the German setting; intraclass correlation coefficients at the subscale level ranged from 0.662 (III) to 0.869 (IV), and 42% of the items showed at least substantial agreement (Cohen’s kappa ≥ 0.60). The results indicate the need to develop supplementary material in a manual that illustrates the meaning of the items and practical implications regarding dementia-specific environmental design. Furthermore, the intersectionality of built and physical environments must be considered when interpreting G-EAT results in future research and applications to residential long-term care practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Fahsold & Kathrin Schmüdderich & Hilde Verbeek & Bernhard Holle & Rebecca Palm, 2022. "Feasibility, Interrater Reliability and Internal Consistency of the German Environmental Audit Tool (G-EAT)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1050-:d:727481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1050/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1050/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1050-:d:727481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.