IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1041-d727324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiences of Women Who Refuse Recall for Further Investigation of Abnormal Screening Mammography: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Wei-Ying Sung

    (Department of Family Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Hui-Chuan Yang

    (Department of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung 43304, Taiwan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • I-Chen Liao

    (Department of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung 43304, Taiwan)

  • Yu-Ting Su

    (Department of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung 43304, Taiwan)

  • Fu-Husan Chen

    (Department of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung 43304, Taiwan)

  • Shu-Ling Chen

    (Department of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung 43304, Taiwan)

Abstract

Breast cancer has the highest incidence among all cancers for women in Taiwan. The current screening policy in Taiwan provides biennial mammogram tests for all women aged 45 to 69 years. A recommendation for further investigation is sent via post to women with a BI-RADS result of 0. The proportion of women who followed-up with a recall request for further investigation after an abnormal mammogram has been below 92.5% in recent years. Therefore, we aimed to explore the experiences of these women who refused recall for further investigation despite an abnormal mammogram. Purposive sampling was conducted on 13 women who refused recall for further examination of abnormal screening mammograms. Data collection included inductive, in-depth interviews or telephone interviews. A content analysis was applied. Three themes were identified: (1) negative screening experiences, (2) struggling with ’to go or not to go’, and (3) rationalizing without a follow-up examination. The first theme included three subthemes: (1) pain of examination, (2) the inconvenience of medical treatment; waiting, and (3) dissatisfaction with having to pay for further examination. The second major theme included three subthemes: (1) perceiving one’s susceptibility to breast cancer as very low, (2) questioning the accuracy of the results, and (3) procrastinating with a “head-in-the-sand” mentality. The third major theme included two subthemes: (1) fatalism and (2) paying attention to self-cultivation. In conclusion, the findings provide important information to healthcare providers involved in case management related to the actual living experiences of women with abnormal screening mammogram results and the additional education required to raise breast cancer awareness in the general public to achieve overall caring goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei-Ying Sung & Hui-Chuan Yang & I-Chen Liao & Yu-Ting Su & Fu-Husan Chen & Shu-Ling Chen, 2022. "Experiences of Women Who Refuse Recall for Further Investigation of Abnormal Screening Mammography: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1041-:d:727324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1041/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1041/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1041-:d:727324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.