IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i2p870-d723924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Methods to Minimize Pain in Newborns during Capillary Blood Sampling for Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Napiórkowska-Orkisz

    (Department of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Żołnierska 14c Street, 10-561 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Gutysz-Wojnicka

    (Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Żołnierska 14c Street, 10-561 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Mariola Tanajewska

    (Department of Neonatology and Intensive Therapy of a Newborn, Provincial Specialist Hospital in Olsztyn, Żołnierska 18 Street, 10-561 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Iwona Sadowska-Krawczenko

    (Department of Neonatology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, ul. Ujejskiego 75, 85-168 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the severity of pain experienced by a newborn during a heel puncture for screening using the Newborn Pain Scale (NIPS), measure the heart rate and compare the effectiveness of non-pharmacological methods of pain control. Design: Randomized clinical trial. No experimental factors. The test was performed during routine screening. Surroundings: Provincial Specialist Hospital in Olsztyn. Patients/Participants: Pain was assessed in 90 full-term newborns. The newborns were rooming in with their mothers in the hospital. Interventions: Newborns were divided into three groups. Three different methods of pain relief were used: breastfeeding, 20% glucose administered orally and non-nutritional sucking. Main Outcome Measures: The primary pain outcome was measured using the NIPS and the secondary pain outcome measures (heart rate, oxygen saturation) were measured using a pulse oximeter. Results: During capillary blood sampling from the heel, most newborns, n = 56 (62.2%), experienced no pain or mild discomfort, severe pain occurred in n = 23 (25.6%) and moderate pain occurred in n = 11 (12.2%). No significant statistical differences were found between the degree of pain intensity and the intervention used to minimize the pain p = 0.24. Statistically significant relationships were demonstrated between heart rate variability and the degree of pain intensity ( p = 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the newborn’s pain intensity and the mother’s opinion on the effectiveness of breastfeeding in minimizing pain. Conclusions: This study did not answer the question of which pain management method used during the heel prick was statistically more effective in reducing pain. However, the results indicate that each of the non-pharmacological interventions (breastfeeding, oral glucose dosing and non-nutritive sucking) applied during heel puncture resulted in effective pain management in most of the newborns enrolled in the study. The relationship between heart rate variability and the severity of pain was confirmed. Mothers of newborns in the breastfeeding group were satisfied with the pain relief methods used in the child and the opportunity to console their newborn during painful procedures in a technologically invasive environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Napiórkowska-Orkisz & Aleksandra Gutysz-Wojnicka & Mariola Tanajewska & Iwona Sadowska-Krawczenko, 2022. "Evaluation of Methods to Minimize Pain in Newborns during Capillary Blood Sampling for Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:870-:d:723924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/870/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/870/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:870-:d:723924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.