IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i2p772-d722078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Distinguish Marfan Syndrome from Marfanoid Habitus in a Physical Examination—Comparison of External Features in Patients with Marfan Syndrome and Marfanoid Habitus

Author

Listed:
  • Lidia Wozniak-Mielczarek

    (Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Michalina Osowicka

    (Department of History of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Alicja Radtke-Lysek

    (1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Magda Drezek-Nojowicz

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Natasza Gilis-Malinowska

    (1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Anna Sabiniewicz

    (Students’ Scientific Circle of the Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Diseases, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Maksymilian Mielczarek

    (1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Robert Sabiniewicz

    (Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland)

Abstract

Marfan Syndrome (MFS) is a systemic disorder caused by mutations in fibrillin-1. The most common cause of mortality in MFS is dissection and rupture of the aorta. Due to a highly variable and age-dependent clinical spectrum, the diagnosis of MFS still remains sophisticated. The aim of the study was to determine if there exist phenotypic features that can play the role of “red flags” in cases of MFS suspicion. The study population included 306 patients (199 children and 107 adults) who were referred to the Department of Pediatric Cardiology due to suspicion of MFS. All patients underwent complete clinical evaluation in order to confirm the diagnosis of MFS according to the modified Ghent criteria. MFS was diagnosed in 109 patients and marfanoid habitus in 168 patients. The study excluded 29 patients with other hereditary thoracic aneurysm syndromes. Comparative analysis between patients with Marfan syndrome and marfanoid habitus was performed. Symptoms with high prevalence and high positive likelihood ratio were identified (pectus carinatum, reduced elbow extension, hindfoot deformity, gothic palate, downslanting palpebral fissures, lens subluxation, myopia ≥ 3 dioptres remarkably high stature). The differentiation between patients with MFS and marfanoid body habitus is not possible by only assessing external body features; however, “red flags” could be helpful in the screening phase.

Suggested Citation

  • Lidia Wozniak-Mielczarek & Michalina Osowicka & Alicja Radtke-Lysek & Magda Drezek-Nojowicz & Natasza Gilis-Malinowska & Anna Sabiniewicz & Maksymilian Mielczarek & Robert Sabiniewicz, 2022. "How to Distinguish Marfan Syndrome from Marfanoid Habitus in a Physical Examination—Comparison of External Features in Patients with Marfan Syndrome and Marfanoid Habitus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:772-:d:722078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/772/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/772/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:772-:d:722078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.