IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i2p757-d721726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Religion and Death in the United States: A Meta-Regression Comparative Assessment of Between-County Mortality Heterogeneity in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Frances Sissamis

    (School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Karina Villalba

    (Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32827, USA)

  • Jordan Garcia

    (Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, Bryan, TX 77807, USA)

  • Vickie Melus

    (Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

  • Emily J. Markentell

    (School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Ligia D. Perez

    (Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

  • Gilbert Ramirez

    (Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

Abstract

Religion can have a favorable impact on individual-level health. The influence of religion on population health, however, remains less clear. This study investigated the association between religion and mortality at the population-level. Using county data, a meta-regression was performed to examine between-county mortality heterogeneity. The percent heterogeneity associated with religion variables were compared to demographics (i.e., place, race, language, age, and gender) and health factors (i.e., individual behaviors, clinical care, social and economic, and physical environment) as predictors of mortality. Religion was measured in terms of adherence (i.e., prevalence attending/belonging to a congregation), congregation density, and the diversity of adherents and congregation by denominations. Results showed counties with lower mortality were associated with higher proportions of religion adherents and a greater diversity of adherents and congregations. Counties with higher mortality were associated with higher religion congregation density. Religion, as a parsimonious multivariate model with all demographic and health factor predictors, had less added value when controlled for individual variables or constructs. The direction of association between religion and mortality was consistent, even when controlling for demographics and health factors, and thus merits further consideration as a population health determinant, as it may play a critical role in understanding other population health outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Frances Sissamis & Karina Villalba & Jordan Garcia & Vickie Melus & Emily J. Markentell & Ligia D. Perez & Gilbert Ramirez, 2022. "Religion and Death in the United States: A Meta-Regression Comparative Assessment of Between-County Mortality Heterogeneity in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:757-:d:721726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/757/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/757/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:757-:d:721726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.