IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i2p631-d718875.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Predictive Utility of Valuing the Future for Smoking Cessation: Findings from the ITC 4 Country Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Ron Borland

    (School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia)

  • Michael Le Grande

    (School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia)

  • Bryan W. Heckman

    (Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
    Center for the Study of Social Determinants of Health, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN 37208, USA)

  • Geoffrey T. Fong

    (Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON N2L 3G1, Canada)

  • Warren K. Bickel

    (Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA)

  • Jeff S. Stein

    (Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA)

  • Katherine A. East

    (School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    Department of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK)

  • Peter A. Hall

    (School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada)

  • Kenneth Michael Cummings

    (Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA)

Abstract

Background: Delay discounting (DD) and time perspective (TP) are conceptually related constructs that are theorized as important determinants of the pursuit of future outcomes over present inclinations. This study explores their predictive relationships for smoking cessation. Methods: 5006 daily smokers at a baseline wave provided 6710 paired observations of quitting activity between two waves. Data are from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) smoking and vaping surveys with samples from the USA, Canada, England, and Australia, across three waves conducted in 2016, 2018 and 2020. Smokers were assessed for TP and DD, plus smoking-specific predictors at one wave of cessation outcomes defined as either making a quit attempt and/or success among those who tried to quit which was ascertained at the subsequent survey wave. Results: TP and DD were essentially uncorrelated. TP predicted making quit attempts, both on its own and controlling for other potential predictors but was negatively associated with quit success. By contrast, DD was not related to making quit attempts, but high DD predicted relapse. The presence of financial stress at baseline resulted in some moderation of effects. Conclusions: Understanding the mechanisms of action of TP and DD can advance our understanding of, and ability to enhance, goal-directed behavioural change. TP appears to contribute to future intention formation, but not necessarily practical thought of how to achieve goals. DD is more likely an index of capacity to effectively generate competing future possibilities in response to immediate gratification.

Suggested Citation

  • Ron Borland & Michael Le Grande & Bryan W. Heckman & Geoffrey T. Fong & Warren K. Bickel & Jeff S. Stein & Katherine A. East & Peter A. Hall & Kenneth Michael Cummings, 2022. "The Predictive Utility of Valuing the Future for Smoking Cessation: Findings from the ITC 4 Country Surveys," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:631-:d:718875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/631/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/631/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:631-:d:718875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.