IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i2p1017-d726799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Sexual and Parenting Rights of People with Physical and Psychical Disabilities: Attitudes of Italians and Socio-Demographic Factors Involved in Recognition and Denial

Author

Listed:
  • Simona Gabriella Di Santo

    (IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Roma, Italy
    Italian Association of Applied Sexology and Psychology (AISPA), Via Marostica 35, 20146 Milano, Italy)

  • Margherita Colombo

    (Superior School of Clinical Sexology of Turin, Via Unione Sovietica 335, 10135 Torino, Italy)

  • Marco Silvaggi

    (Institute of Clinical Sexology (ISC), Via Savoia 78, 00198 Roma, Italy)

  • Giorgia Rosamaria Gammino

    (Italian Center of Sexology (CIS), Via Scipione Dal Ferro, 4, 40138 Bologna, Italy)

  • Valentina Fava

    (Research Group for Sexology, Via S. Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy)

  • Chiara Malandrino

    (Research Group for Sexology, Via S. Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy)

  • Chiara Nanini

    (Interdisciplinary Centre for Research and Training in Sexology (CIRS), Via Angelo Ceppi di Bairolo 1/8, 16126 Genova, Italy)

  • Cristina Rossetto

    (Study Center for Affective and Sexual Disorders Treatment (DAS), Via G.T. Invrea 20/2, 16129 Genova, Italy)

  • Sara Simone

    (Institute of Research and Training (IRF), Via Luigi Alamanni 23, 50123 Firenze, Italy)

  • Stefano Eleuteri

    (World Association of Sexual Health, c/o Kristen Mark World Association for Sexual Health Secretariat 1300 S. 2nd Street, Suite 180, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA
    Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00185 Roma, Italy)

Abstract

The sexual and parenting rights (SPRs) of people with disabilities (PwDs) are under-recognized. Sociodemographic factors may influence attitudes towards them. The aims of this study were: (1) to analyze the levels of agreement of a sample of Italian people with some SPRs of PwDs; (2) to inquire if the SPRs of people with psychical disabilities (PwPSYDs) were less recognized than those with physical disabilities (PwPHDs); (3) to verify if sociodemographic characteristics associated with under-recognition. An online anonymous survey was distributed using non-random sampling methods to conduct an inquiry into the level of agreement with statements regarding the SPRs of PwPHDs and PwPSYDs to have satisfying sexuality, to marry, and to adopt children. Answers from 973 Italian participants, aged 18–84 years (71.1% females) were analyzed. At least 70% of respondents declared in favor of the SPRs of PwPHDs. The SPRs of PwPSYDs were always subjected to higher under-recognition. Religiosity, male sex, higher age, and lower education were the factors most often associated with being against the SPRs of PwDs. Improved identification of the less tolerant respondents and the less recognized categories may allow for specific strategies for promoting the recognition of the SPRs for PwDs.

Suggested Citation

  • Simona Gabriella Di Santo & Margherita Colombo & Marco Silvaggi & Giorgia Rosamaria Gammino & Valentina Fava & Chiara Malandrino & Chiara Nanini & Cristina Rossetto & Sara Simone & Stefano Eleuteri, 2022. "The Sexual and Parenting Rights of People with Physical and Psychical Disabilities: Attitudes of Italians and Socio-Demographic Factors Involved in Recognition and Denial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:1017-:d:726799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/1017/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/1017/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:1017-:d:726799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.