IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16958-d1006129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reduction in COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Seoul according to Age, Sex, and Symptoms: A Test-Negative Case-Control Study

Author

Listed:
  • Hyerin Gim

    (Infectious Disease Research Center, Citizen’s Health Bureau, Seoul Metropolitan Government, 110, Sejong-daero, Jung-gu, Seoul 04524, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Soyoung Oh

    (Infectious Disease Research Center, Citizen’s Health Bureau, Seoul Metropolitan Government, 110, Sejong-daero, Jung-gu, Seoul 04524, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Heeda Lee

    (Infectious Disease Research Center, Citizen’s Health Bureau, Seoul Metropolitan Government, 110, Sejong-daero, Jung-gu, Seoul 04524, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Seul Lee

    (Infectious Disease Research Center, Citizen’s Health Bureau, Seoul Metropolitan Government, 110, Sejong-daero, Jung-gu, Seoul 04524, Republic of Korea)

  • Haesook Seo

    (Infectious Disease Research Center, Citizen’s Health Bureau, Seoul Metropolitan Government, 110, Sejong-daero, Jung-gu, Seoul 04524, Republic of Korea)

  • Yumi Park

    (Citizen’s Health Bureau, Seoul Metropolitan Government, 110, Sejong-daero, Jung-gu, Seoul 04524, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jae-Hyun Park

    (Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Background: We evaluated vaccine effectiveness (VE) against infections with SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in Seoul, the capital of the Republic of Korea, having the highest population density in the country, under real-world conditions. Methods: We evaluated the reduction in the effectiveness of mRNA and viral-vector COVID-19 vaccines against infection by the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant in a subpopulation from April 2021 to July 2021 who visited screening clinics in Seoul using a test-negative case-control study design. Moreover, we conducted a case-control study matching the ten-year-old age group, sex, healthcare workers, and five districts of Seoul, which are considered confounding factors. Results: The full VE in the pre-delta-dominant period was 95.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.2–97.2); however, it decreased to 61.1% (95% CI: 53.2–67.6) during the delta-dominant period. Notably, we found that COVID-19 VE was significantly decreased in individuals aged ≥80 years (52.9%, 95% CI: −9.9–79.8), men (50.6 %, 95% CI: 39.4–59.8), and asymptomatic individuals (49.8%, 95% CI: 36.5–60.3) during the widespread SARS-CoV-2 delta variant circulation. Conclusions: Vaccine-mediated protection drastically declined during the delta-dominant period and in vulnerable groups. This study suggests the requirement for additional countermeasures, such as the administration of a booster vaccine, in vulnerable groups based on age, sex, and symptomatic manifestation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyerin Gim & Soyoung Oh & Heeda Lee & Seul Lee & Haesook Seo & Yumi Park & Jae-Hyun Park, 2022. "Reduction in COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Seoul according to Age, Sex, and Symptoms: A Test-Negative Case-Control Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16958-:d:1006129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16958/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16958/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16958-:d:1006129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.