IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16836-d1004047.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing versus Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Treating Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Hudays

    (Community, Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia)

  • Robyn Gallagher

    (Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2050, Australia)

  • Ahmed Hazazi

    (Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 13316, Saudi Arabia)

  • Amal Arishi

    (Medical Surgical Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ghareeb Bahari

    (Nursing Administration and Education Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

This meta-analysis review compared eye movement desensitization and reprocessing and cognitive behavior therapy efficacy in reducing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression symptoms. A systematic search for articles published between 2010 and 2020 was conducted using five databases. The RevMan software version 5 was used. Out of 671 studies, 8 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Three studies reported that eye movement desensitization and reprocessing reduced depression symptoms better than cognitive behavior therapy in both children, adolescents, and adults (SDM (95% CI) = −2.43 (−3.93–−0.94), p = 0.001). In three other studies, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing were shown to reduce anxiety in children and adolescents better than cognitive behavior therapy (SDM (95% CI) = −3.99 (−5.47–−2.52), p < 0.001). In terms of reducing PTSD symptoms, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing and cognitive behavior therapy did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences (SDM (95% CI) = −0.14 (−0.48–0.21), p = 0.44). There was no statistically significant difference at the three-month follow-up and at the six-month follow-up for depression ( p = 0.31), anxiety ( p = 0.59), and PTSD ( p = 0.55). We recommend randomized trials with larger samples and longer follow-up times in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Hudays & Robyn Gallagher & Ahmed Hazazi & Amal Arishi & Ghareeb Bahari, 2022. "Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing versus Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Treating Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16836-:d:1004047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16836/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16836/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesca Gimigliano & Vanessa M. Young & Chiara Arienti & Silvia Bargeri & Greta Castellini & Silvia Gianola & Stefano G. Lazzarini & Antimo Moretti & Allen W. Heinemann & Stefano Negrini, 2022. "The Effectiveness of Behavioral Interventions in Adults with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder during Clinical Rehabilitation: A Rapid Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16836-:d:1004047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.