IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16803-d1003390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge, Attitude, and Acceptance of Sinopharm and AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 Vaccines among Egyptian Population: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Marian S. Boshra

    (Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62511, Egypt)

  • Marwa O. Elgendy

    (Clinical Pharmacy Department, Beni-Suef University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62511, Egypt
    Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nahda University (NUB), Beni-Suef 62513, Egypt)

  • Lamiaa N Abdelaty

    (Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, October 6 University, Giza 12525, Egypt)

  • Mahmoud Tammam

    (IQVIA, Cairo 10245, Egypt)

  • Abdullah S. Alanazi

    (Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
    Health Sciences Research Unit, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulaziz Ibrahim Alzarea

    (Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia)

  • Saud Alsahali

    (Department of Pharmacy Practice, Unaizah College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Unaizah 51911, Saudi Arabia)

  • Rania M. Sarhan

    (Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62511, Egypt)

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the Egyptian population’s preference and awareness related to available COVID-19 vaccines and to determine different factors that can affect beliefs concerning these vaccines. Methods: A cross-sectional web-based study was carried out among the general population in Egypt. Data collection was conducted via an online questionnaire. Results: About 426 subjects participated in the survey. Vaccine preference is nearly equally even (50%) among all respondents. There was no significant difference in vaccine preference according to age, gender, residence, educational level, or social status. About 50% of public respondents mentioned that both AstraZeneca and Sinopharm vaccines do not offer protection against new variant COVID-19 strains. Healthcare workers are the lowest respondents to agree that vaccines offer protection against new COVID-19 variants (10.9%) compared to unemployed respondents (20.3%) and other professions (68.8%) with a statistically significant difference ( p < 0.005). Safety of vaccine administration among children below 18 showed statistical differences for gender and educational level predictors. Conclusions: Most of the study population has satisfying knowledge about the COVID-19 vaccine. Continuous awareness campaigns must be carried out so that the people’s background is updated with any new information that would help in raising the trust in vaccination.

Suggested Citation

  • Marian S. Boshra & Marwa O. Elgendy & Lamiaa N Abdelaty & Mahmoud Tammam & Abdullah S. Alanazi & Abdulaziz Ibrahim Alzarea & Saud Alsahali & Rania M. Sarhan, 2022. "Knowledge, Attitude, and Acceptance of Sinopharm and AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 Vaccines among Egyptian Population: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16803-:d:1003390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16803/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16803/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16803-:d:1003390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.