IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16747-d1002438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health-Related Quality-of-Life among Pregnant Women after First, Second, and Multiple Cesarean Sections in the Perinatal Period: A Short-Term Longitudinal Study

Author

Listed:
  • Michalina Ilska

    (Institute of Psychology, University of Silesia in Katowice, Grażyńskiego Street 53, 40-126 Katowice, Poland)

  • Anna Kołodziej-Zaleska

    (Institute of Psychology, University of Silesia in Katowice, Grażyńskiego Street 53, 40-126 Katowice, Poland)

  • Ewa Banaś-Fiebrich

    (Clinical Department of Perinatology, Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Ruda Ślaska, Medical University of Silesia, W. Lipa Street 2, 41-703 Ruda Śląska, Poland)

  • Anna Brandt-Salmeri

    (Institute of Psychology, University of Silesia in Katowice, Grażyńskiego Street 53, 40-126 Katowice, Poland)

  • Ewa Janowska-Tyc

    (Clinical Department of Perinatology, Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Ruda Ślaska, Medical University of Silesia, W. Lipa Street 2, 41-703 Ruda Śląska, Poland)

  • Anna Łyszczarz

    (Clinical Department of Perinatology, Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Ruda Ślaska, Medical University of Silesia, W. Lipa Street 2, 41-703 Ruda Śląska, Poland)

  • Justina Rzewiczok

    (Clinical Department of Perinatology, Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Ruda Ślaska, Medical University of Silesia, W. Lipa Street 2, 41-703 Ruda Śląska, Poland)

  • Bogusława Piela

    (Clinical Department of Perinatology, Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Ruda Ślaska, Medical University of Silesia, W. Lipa Street 2, 41-703 Ruda Śląska, Poland)

  • Wojciech Cnota

    (Clinical Department of Perinatology, Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Ruda Ślaska, Medical University of Silesia, W. Lipa Street 2, 41-703 Ruda Śląska, Poland
    Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 41-703 Ruda Śląska, Poland)

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to compare assessments of health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in women who had a medical qualification for cesarean section (CS), depending on the number of CSs in their medical history. A short longitudinal study was conducted among 115 women on the day before a planned cesarean section (CS)-T1, and on the third day after CS-T2. They were divided into three groups. G1: no CS ( n = 17); G2: one CS ( n = 34); G3: two or more CSs ( n = 64). Participants completed a set of questionnaires concerning sociodemographic aspects and psychological outcomes: the HRQoL questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L). A chi-square test, McNemar’s test, and repeated measures ANOVA were used to compare the three groups in T1 and T2. Regardless of the number of CSs, before a CS, women mainly experience health problems with pain and anxiety/depression, and after a CS, mostly problems with pain, usual activity, and mobility. All participants experienced an increase in the amount of health problems with mobility and pain after a CS. Women who have had two or more CSs also had problems with self-care and usual activities. Women who have had one or two CSs experienced a decrease in the general assessment of the HRQoL, which is not observed in the group of women with multiple CSs. However, the HRQoL of women in the group with multiple CSs was lower before the CS than in the other groups. The results indicated the significance of the number of CSs, not only in postoperative, but also in preoperative HRQoL.

Suggested Citation

  • Michalina Ilska & Anna Kołodziej-Zaleska & Ewa Banaś-Fiebrich & Anna Brandt-Salmeri & Ewa Janowska-Tyc & Anna Łyszczarz & Justina Rzewiczok & Bogusława Piela & Wojciech Cnota, 2022. "Health-Related Quality-of-Life among Pregnant Women after First, Second, and Multiple Cesarean Sections in the Perinatal Period: A Short-Term Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16747-:d:1002438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16747/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16747/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16747-:d:1002438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.