IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16706-d1001540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ratings of Hand Activity and Force Levels among Women and Men Who Perform Identical Hand-Intensive Work Tasks

Author

Listed:
  • Gunilla Dahlgren

    (Section of Sustainable Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden)

  • Per Liv

    (Section of Sustainable Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden)

  • Fredrik Öhberg

    (Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden)

  • Lisbeth Slunga Järvholm

    (Section of Sustainable Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden)

  • Mikael Forsman

    (IMM Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
    Division of Ergonomics, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Hälsovägen 11C, S-141 57 Huddinge, Sweden)

  • Börje Rehn

    (Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden)

Abstract

We compared hand activity and force ratings in women and men doing identical hand-intensive work tasks. Musculoskeletal disorders are more common in women and hand-intensive work leads to an increased risk of these disorders. Knowledge of the gender influence in the rating of work exposure is lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate whether women and men performing identical hand-intensive work tasks were equally rated using hand activity and normalized peak force levels with the Hand Activity Threshold Limit Value ® . Fifty-six workers participated, comprising 28 women–men pairs. Four observers—two woman–man pairs—were also involved. Self-ratings and observers’ ratings of hand activity and force level were collected. The results of these ratings showed no significant gender differences in self-rated hand activity and force, as well as observer-rated hand activity. However, there was a significant gender difference in the observer-rated force, where the women were rated higher (mean (SD): women 3.9 (2.7), men 3.1 (1.8) ( p = 0.01)). This difference remained significant in the adjusted model ( p = 0.04) with grip strength and forearm–finger anthropometrics. The results provide new insights that observers’ estimates of force can be higher in women compared with men in the same work tasks. Force should be further investigated and preferably compared to objective measurements.

Suggested Citation

  • Gunilla Dahlgren & Per Liv & Fredrik Öhberg & Lisbeth Slunga Järvholm & Mikael Forsman & Börje Rehn, 2022. "Ratings of Hand Activity and Force Levels among Women and Men Who Perform Identical Hand-Intensive Work Tasks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16706-:d:1001540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16706/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16706/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16706-:d:1001540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.