IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16705-d1001523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnostic Study to Assess the Performance of a New Urinary Legionella Antigen Test—A National Study in Three Referral University Hospitals in Austria during 2014–2017

Author

Listed:
  • Ziad El-Khatib

    (Institute for Surveillance & Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Währingerstrasse 25a, 1090 Vienna, Austria
    Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Lukas Richter

    (Institute for Surveillance & Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Währingerstrasse 25a, 1090 Vienna, Austria)

  • Jutta Ressler

    (Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Währingerstrasse 25a, 1090 Vienna, Austria)

  • Bernhard Benka

    (Institute for Surveillance & Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Währingerstrasse 25a, 1090 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the performance of a rapid diagnostic antigen test (Coris) as an index test versus the urinary Antigen ELISA (Bartels) as the reference test. Methods: Prospective diagnostic accuracy study (2014–2017) at three university hospitals in Austria. Results: A total of 996 patients were included in the study. Legionellosis was diagnosed in 49/996 (4.9%) using the reference test. The sensitivity and specificity of the Coris test were 75.5% (95% CI 61.1–86.7%) and 100% (95%CI 99.6–100%), respectively. The PPV was 100% and when using the lower 95% CI limit of the estimate for sensitivity, the resulting PPV was 61.1%. The NPV was 98.7% and the accuracy was 98.8%. The index test showed a PPV > 97% during the period of summer and autumn (May through November) and ≥88% during winter (December through February). The NPV was >97% during all of the periods. The median of the monthly incidence in the general population was 0.1 per 100,000 (IQR 0.1; 0.3). Conclusion: The new rapid test gave a high level of diagnostic accuracy in a rapid fashion. The test can be applied at the bedside by non-laboratory staff.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziad El-Khatib & Lukas Richter & Jutta Ressler & Bernhard Benka, 2022. "Diagnostic Study to Assess the Performance of a New Urinary Legionella Antigen Test—A National Study in Three Referral University Hospitals in Austria during 2014–2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-7, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16705-:d:1001523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16705/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16705/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16705-:d:1001523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.