IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16463-d997198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrative Wellness Approaches to Mitigate Perceived Stress, Increase Vitality, and Build Community during COVID-19: A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Amber L. Vermeesch

    (Department of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27402, USA)

  • Layla Garrigues

    (University of Portland School of Nursing & Health Innovations, Portland, OR 97203, USA)

  • Chloé Littzen-Brown

    (University of Portland School of Nursing & Health Innovations, Portland, OR 97203, USA)

Abstract

Introduction: In January 2020, a small, private school of nursing in a university in the pacific northwest, established the Initiative for Vital Practice (I4VP). The I4VP’s primary goal was to create a sustainable pathway for increasing vital practice through increasing resiliency and self-care practices. Objectives. The ensuing pathway’s objectives were to, (1) take previously identified factors related to perceived stress related to workloads, impacts on professional quality of life and psychosocial exposures during the COVID-19 pandemic; and (2) develop and pilot test a wellness intervention (i.e., wellness pods) for faculty and staff to build community and find new ways to enhance well-being through peer support. Methods: Five focused Wellness Pods were developed on Microsoft Teams platform using the individual channels: (1) stress and mind–body exploration pod; (2) mindfulness in healthcare pod; (3) healing relationship pod; (4) environmental pod; and (5) physical activity pod. Faculty and staff self-selected into a Wellness Pod that interested them. The Wellness Pods met weekly in person over a period of two months. Quantitative and qualitative data was collected via cross-sectional surveys including: four sociodemographic items, one item on current stress level, one write-in item on current stress management at work, two write-in items focused on the cognitive reasoning for participation, the 7-item subjective vitality scale focused individual difference, the 7-item subjective vitality scale focused on the state level, the 10-item perceived stress scale, and one item ranking which wellness pod the individual wanted to participate in. There was one trained facilitator for the overall Wellness Pods operations and communication. Results. The average score on the perceived stress scale was 22.3 (SD = 3.5), indicating moderate levels of perceived stress. The average score on the individual difference vitality score was 26.5 (SD = 7.6), whereas the state level vitality score was 21.4 (SD = 9.98), indicating moderate levels of subjective vitality. Two categories: stress management and wellness pods, were identified through content analysis. Conclusions: Through pilot testing, this project demonstrated feasibility for future wellness pods interventions for faculty and staff at schools of nursing. Future research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the wellness pods intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Amber L. Vermeesch & Layla Garrigues & Chloé Littzen-Brown, 2022. "Integrative Wellness Approaches to Mitigate Perceived Stress, Increase Vitality, and Build Community during COVID-19: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16463-:d:997198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16463/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16463/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16463-:d:997198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.