IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p16344-d994956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collective Motivational Interviewing for Individuals with Drug Use Problems: A Pre-Post–Follow-Up, Uncontrolled Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Nick Tse

    (Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China
    Department of Applied Social Sciences, HKCT Institute of Higher Education, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China)

  • Samson Tse

    (Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China)

  • Paul W.C. Wong

    (Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Collective motivational interviewing (CMI) is a novelty motivational approach which optimises the motivational interviewing (MI) for individuals from collectivistic cultures. While MI has been empirically tested as an effective intervention for addictive disorders and has had a positive effect on facilitating lifestyle changes, CMI has retained the potency of MI as an individualistic intervention, and it further invites the social network resources to strengthen the level of motivation and cultivate a joint change partnership. This pilot study was the first clinical study of CMI to work with individuals with drug use problems (IDUPs) by involving concerned significant others (CSOs) in the three-session intervention, and the fidelity control was assessed by the Collective Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (CMITI) scale. This pre-post–follow-up and uncontrolled feasibility study was conducted between 2017 and 2019, with dyads of 20 IDUPs and their CSOs. The potential impacts of CMI were examined by measures at baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month and 3-month post-intervention. All clinical sessions were audio-recorded, and four cases were randomly selected for fidelity review by two trained coders. The normality of data at the baseline was checked by a Shapiro–Wilk test. Non-parametric Wilcoxon-signed-rank test and repeated-measures ANOVA were employed for quantitative analysis. The results showed that six IDUPs had reduced drug use, and ten maintained drug abstinence with the support of CSOs, whereas four IDUPs remained unchanged or increased drug use. Overall, at the 3-month follow-up, drug use was reduced ( p > 0.05), social support was strengthened ( p < 0.05), and the IDUPs’ motivation for change was enhanced ( p < 0.05). However, the small sample sizes, non-random sampling, and lack of control group may limit the generalizability and confirmation of the outcomes and of the “real effects”. This finding of the study suggests that the CMI is a feasible and acceptable therapeutic tool to motivate IDUPs with the support of CSOs to achieve mutually agreed-upon goals. Further development and evaluation with robust methodology are warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Nick Tse & Samson Tse & Paul W.C. Wong, 2022. "Collective Motivational Interviewing for Individuals with Drug Use Problems: A Pre-Post–Follow-Up, Uncontrolled Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16344-:d:994956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16344/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16344/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16344-:d:994956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.