IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p16230-d993193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Skinfold Thickness Measured by Caliper and Ultrasound Scanner in Normative Weight Women

Author

Listed:
  • Zdzisław Lewandowski

    (Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Ewelina Dychała

    (Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Pisula-Lewandowska

    (Department of Fundamentals of Cosmetology, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Dariusz P. Danel

    (Department of Anthropology, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Rudolfa Weigla 12, 53-144 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

Obesity is a major issue affecting not only adults but also children in many places of the world. There are numerous methods for estimating the body fat percentage, however, all of those methods are different in terms of availability, accuracy, and the cost of an individual examination. The aim of this study was to compare two relatively easy and widespread measurement methods for assessing skinfold thickness: the BodyMetrix BX2000 ultrasound machine and a classic GPM caliper. Fifty-eight young women aged 19–24 years with normative body weight participated in the study. We found that although the measurements performed by both methods are positively correlated, the obtained values were different. In seven out of nine measured points, these differences were statistically significant. The measurements of skin fat folds with a caliper showed a higher value of subcutaneous tissue compared to ultrasound measurements. Only the values of measurements on the pectoral and mid-axillary did not differ between the methods. We conclude that due to the significant discrepancies in the values of measured skinfold thickness, appropriate measurement tools and dedicated formulas estimating the amount of body fat should be used.

Suggested Citation

  • Zdzisław Lewandowski & Ewelina Dychała & Agnieszka Pisula-Lewandowska & Dariusz P. Danel, 2022. "Comparison of Skinfold Thickness Measured by Caliper and Ultrasound Scanner in Normative Weight Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-7, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16230-:d:993193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16230/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16230/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16230-:d:993193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.