IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p16028-d989385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recovery following Orthognathic Surgery Procedures—A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Cristian Dinu

    (Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, 37 Cardinal Iuliu Hossu Street, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Avram Manea

    (Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, 37 Cardinal Iuliu Hossu Street, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Denisa Tomoiagă

    (Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, 37 Cardinal Iuliu Hossu Street, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Mihaela Băciuț

    (Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, 37 Cardinal Iuliu Hossu Street, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Oana Almășan

    (Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 32 Clinicilor Street, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Andrei Otto Mitre

    (Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, 37 Cardinal Iuliu Hossu Street, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Ioan Barbur

    (Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, 37 Cardinal Iuliu Hossu Street, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Mihaela Hedeșiu

    (Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, 37 Cardinal Iuliu Hossu Street, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Gabriel Armencea

    (Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, 37 Cardinal Iuliu Hossu Street, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Horia Opriș

    (Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, 37 Cardinal Iuliu Hossu Street, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Sebastian Stoia

    (Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, 37 Cardinal Iuliu Hossu Street, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Tiberiu Tamaș

    (Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, 37 Cardinal Iuliu Hossu Street, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Grigore Băciuț

    (Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, 37 Cardinal Iuliu Hossu Street, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Florin Onișor

    (Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, 37 Cardinal Iuliu Hossu Street, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Simion Bran

    (Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, 37 Cardinal Iuliu Hossu Street, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

This study aims at evaluating and categorizing patients’ objective and subjective postoperative recovery symptoms after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery assigning the healing process. The patients were monitored throughout the recovery process, and their symptoms were managed. A prospective, observational study was performed. Patients with Class II and III malocclusion (aged 18 to 35) were evaluated and monitored preoperatively, and postoperatively at 48 h, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postsurgery. A questionnaire was used to assess pain and anesthesia/hypoesthesia. The most common objective and subjective signs that were correlated with the healing process were edema, hematoma, trismus, pain, and anesthesia/hypoesthesia. Edema peaked at 48–72 h postoperatively (distance between eye’s external canthus and gonion, mean difference = 4.53, between tragus and cheilion, mean difference = 7, between tragus and gnathion, mean difference = 4.65, p < 0.001); mouth opening amplitude was significantly decreased during the first two weeks postsurgery (class II, mean difference = 32.42, p = 0.006, class III, mean difference = 44.57, p < 0.001), but it steadily and considerably improved over three months. The nose tended to widen postsurgery. The most severe pain experienced by patients was of medium intensity in the mandibular body, described as pressure, and usually did not spread. Patients were most severely and persistently impacted by anesthesia/hypoesthesia.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristian Dinu & Avram Manea & Denisa Tomoiagă & Mihaela Băciuț & Oana Almășan & Andrei Otto Mitre & Ioan Barbur & Mihaela Hedeșiu & Gabriel Armencea & Horia Opriș & Sebastian Stoia & Tiberiu Tamaș & G, 2022. "Recovery following Orthognathic Surgery Procedures—A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16028-:d:989385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16028/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16028/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16028-:d:989385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.