IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15624-d983375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Health Information Provided by Public Health Stakeholders on Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Hasenpusch

    (Department of Social Work, Health and Media, Magdeburg-Stendal University of Applied Sciences, 39114 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Henriette Faßhauer

    (Department of Social Work, Health and Media, Magdeburg-Stendal University of Applied Sciences, 39114 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Annemarie Minow

    (Department of Social Work, Health and Media, Magdeburg-Stendal University of Applied Sciences, 39114 Magdeburg, Germany
    Department of Studies and Teaching Medicine, University of Lübeck, 23567 Lübeck, Germany)

  • Lena Kannengießer

    (Department of Social Work, Health and Media, Magdeburg-Stendal University of Applied Sciences, 39114 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Ilona Hrudey

    (Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Svenja Walter

    (Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Christoph Stallmann

    (Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Enno Swart

    (Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Stefanie March

    (Department of Social Work, Health and Media, Magdeburg-Stendal University of Applied Sciences, 39114 Magdeburg, Germany)

Abstract

In the federal state of Germany, Saxony-Anhalt, colorectal cancer is the second most frequent cause of death among cancer patients. In order to identify cancer precursors early, colorectal cancer screenings are essential. In this context, health information contributes to informing individuals and imparting them with necessary knowledge to make a decision about (non-)utilization of preventive services. Numerous public health stakeholders (e.g., statutory health insurances) provide health information. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of web-based health information offered by public health stakeholders in Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. A systematic evaluation was used. A search was performed using pre-defined eligibility criteria and search terms. Two independent reviewers assessed the search results based on seven main categories (60 items) developed by the study team in line with the “Guideline Evidence-based Health Information”. In total, 37 materials from 16 different stakeholders were included and yielded a “mediocre quality” (median = 69%). The materials had only partially fulfilled the requirements of national recommendations for evidence-based health information. Access to digital health information regarding colon cancer screening was unsatisfactory, especially for individuals with auditory or visual impairments, due to use of inappropriate communication technologies. Further efforts are required to improve digital health information about colorectal cancer screening.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Hasenpusch & Henriette Faßhauer & Annemarie Minow & Lena Kannengießer & Ilona Hrudey & Svenja Walter & Christoph Stallmann & Enno Swart & Stefanie March, 2022. "Digital Health Information Provided by Public Health Stakeholders on Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15624-:d:983375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15624/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15624/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15624-:d:983375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.