IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15453-d980396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calling for Help—Peer-Based Psychosocial Support for Medical Staff by Telephone—A Best Practice Example from Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Dominik Hinzmann

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
    Association for Psychosocial Competence and Support in Acute Care-PSU-Akut, 81373 Munich, Germany)

  • Andrea Forster

    (Association for Psychosocial Competence and Support in Acute Care-PSU-Akut, 81373 Munich, Germany)

  • Marion Koll-Krüsmann

    (Association for Psychosocial Competence and Support in Acute Care-PSU-Akut, 81373 Munich, Germany)

  • Andreas Schießl

    (Association for Psychosocial Competence and Support in Acute Care-PSU-Akut, 81373 Munich, Germany)

  • Frederick Schneider

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany)

  • Tanja Sigl-Erkel

    (Association for Psychosocial Competence and Support in Acute Care-PSU-Akut, 81373 Munich, Germany)

  • Andreas Igl

    (Association for Psychosocial Competence and Support in Acute Care-PSU-Akut, 81373 Munich, Germany)

  • Susanne Katharina Heininger

    (Association for Psychosocial Competence and Support in Acute Care-PSU-Akut, 81373 Munich, Germany)

Abstract

Background: A telephone support hotline (PSU-HELPLINE) was established at the beginning of the pandemic due to the burden on health professionals and the lack of support at the workplace. The aim of this study was to evaluate the telephone support service for health professionals in terms of its burden, benefits, and mechanisms of action. Methods: Data collection was conducted during and after calls by PSU-HELPLINE counsellors. In addition to the socio-demographic data evaluation, burdens of the callers and the benefits of the calls were collected. The content-analytical evaluation of the stresses as well as the effect factors were based on Mayring’s (2022). Results: Most of the callers were highly to very highly stressed. The usefulness of the conversation was rated as strong to very strong by both callers and counsellors. The PSU-HELPLINE was used primarily for processing serious events and in phases of overload. The support work was carried out through the following aspects of so-called effect factors, among others: psychoeducation, change of perspective, resource activation, problem actualization, connectedness, information, problem solving, self-efficacy, and preservation of resources. Conclusions: The expansion of local peer support structures and the possibility of a telephone helpline are recommended. Further research is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominik Hinzmann & Andrea Forster & Marion Koll-Krüsmann & Andreas Schießl & Frederick Schneider & Tanja Sigl-Erkel & Andreas Igl & Susanne Katharina Heininger, 2022. "Calling for Help—Peer-Based Psychosocial Support for Medical Staff by Telephone—A Best Practice Example from Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15453-:d:980396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15453/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15453/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15453-:d:980396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.