IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p15299-d977809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Before-and-After Study of the First Four Years of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS ® ) Programme in Older Adults Undergoing Elective Colorectal Cancer Surgery

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Martínez-Escribano

    (Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Therapeutics of Pain, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, Ctra de Corbera, km 1, 46600 Alzira, Valencia, Spain
    Medical School, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, 46001 Valencia, Valencia, Spain)

  • Francisco Arteaga Moreno

    (Medical School, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, 46001 Valencia, Valencia, Spain)

  • David Cuesta Peredo

    (Quality of Care Department, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, 46600 Alzira, Valencia, Spain)

  • Francisco Javier Blanco Gonzalez

    (General Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, 46600 Alzira, Valencia, Spain)

  • Juan Maria De la Cámara-de las Heras

    (Library Service, Hospital Universitario La Ribera, 46600 Alzira, Valencia, Spain)

  • Francisco J. Tarazona Santabalbina

    (Geriatric Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, 46600 Alzira, Valencia, Spain
    Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), 28029 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to determine whether the inclusion of older patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer resection in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS ® ) programme could improve clinical outcomes during hospital admission. Methods: A before-and-after study in ≥70-year-old patients electively admitted for colorectal cancer resection was designed. In total, 213 patients were included in the ERAS ® group, and 158 were included in the control group. Results: The average age was 77.9 years old (SD 5.31) and 57.14% of them were men, with a Charlson Index score of 3.42 (SD 3.32). The ERAS ® group presented a lower transfusion rate of 42 (19.7%), compared to 75 (47.5%) in the control group ( p < 0.001). The crude odds ratio (OR) for transfusion was 0.27 (95% CI 0.17–0.43; p < 0.001), and the adjusted odds ratio was 0.26 (95% CI 0.14–0.48; p < 0.001). The ERAS ® group had a lower percentage of patients with moderate–severe malnutrition on admission, at 23.4% (37 patients) against 36.2% in the control group (42 patients) ( p = 0.023), with an OR of 0.47 (95% CI 0.29–0.75; p < 0.002) and an adjusted OR of 0.48 (95% CI 0.29–0.78; p = 0.003). The number of patients who required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) was also markedly lower: 54 from the ERAS ® group (25.4%) versus 71 from the control group (44.9%) ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: The inclusion of ≥70-year-old adults in the ERAS ® programme resulted in a decrease in transfusions, number of erythrocyte concentrates transfused, and number of ICU admissions, along with improved nutritional status.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Martínez-Escribano & Francisco Arteaga Moreno & David Cuesta Peredo & Francisco Javier Blanco Gonzalez & Juan Maria De la Cámara-de las Heras & Francisco J. Tarazona Santabalbina, 2022. "Before-and-After Study of the First Four Years of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS ® ) Programme in Older Adults Undergoing Elective Colorectal Cancer Surgery," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15299-:d:977809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15299/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15299/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15299-:d:977809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.