IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p15200-d976074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of the Global Lung Function Initiative 2012 Spirometry Reference Values in a Healthy Italian Working Population

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Fontana

    (Section of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Dante Luigi Cioffi

    (Section of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Veruscka Leso

    (Section of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Emanuele D’Ausilio

    (Section of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Daniela Pacella

    (Section of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Mauro Fedele

    (Section of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Mauro Maniscalco

    (Pulmonary Rehabilitation Unit, Institute ICS Maugeri SpA SB, Via Bagni Vecchi 1, 82037 Telese Terme, Italy)

  • Ivo Iavicoli

    (Section of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

Background: Several studies showed important differences in the interpretation of spirometry based on different reference values, in particular by comparing European Respiratory Society (ERS) 1993 and Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) 2012. The validation of new reference values in local populations is essential before they can be used in an appropriate manner. This study aimed to investigate the fit of GLI reference values in a healthy Italian working population. Methods: Spirometry data were collected in 1355 workers during their health surveillance medical examination conducted for exposure to chemical and biological risk factors. A single portable spirometer that met the ATS/ERS recommendations for occupational testing was used and calibrated daily. Results: Average z-score were −0.13 (with a median of −0.17), −0.25 (with a median of −0.24), and 0.18 (with a median of 0.17) for FEV 1 , FVC, and FEV 1 /FVC ratio, respectively. Considering only the normal-weighted workers, the average z-scores were −0.07 (with a median of −0.16), −0.15 (with a median of −0.16), and 0.07 (with a median of 0.02) for FEV 1 , FVC, and FEV 1 /FVC ratio, respectively. Conclusions: GLI 2012 reference values fit the Italian data satisfactorily, resulting as more accurate than ERS 1993, especially in women, normal-weighted subjects, aged 30−50 years, and for height < 165 cm.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Fontana & Dante Luigi Cioffi & Veruscka Leso & Emanuele D’Ausilio & Daniela Pacella & Mauro Fedele & Mauro Maniscalco & Ivo Iavicoli, 2022. "Validation of the Global Lung Function Initiative 2012 Spirometry Reference Values in a Healthy Italian Working Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-10, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15200-:d:976074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15200/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15200/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15200-:d:976074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.