IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p15047-d973680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physical, Optical, and Mechanical Properties of Ceramic Materials after Coffee Immersion and Evaluation of Cleaning Impact with Different Oral Hygiene Tools

Author

Listed:
  • Nasser M. Al Ahmari

    (Prosthetic Department, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia)

  • Maram A. Alahmari

    (Saudi Board Prosthodontic Resident, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammed M. Al Moaleem

    (Department of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
    Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ibn al-Nafis for Medical Sciences, Sana’a 4337, Yemen)

  • Raghad S. A. Alshahrani

    (Dental Interns, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia)

  • Fatimah F. Alqahtani

    (Dental Interns, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia)

  • Waad Saeed Mohammed

    (Dental Interns, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia)

  • Bandar M. A. Al-Makramani

    (Department of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia)

  • Vini Mehta

    (Department of Public Health Dentistry, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune 411018, India)

  • Aida Meto

    (Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Aldent, 1007 Tirana, Albania
    Clinical Microbiology, School of Dentistry, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy)

  • Agron Meto

    (Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Aldent, 1007 Tirana, Albania)

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of three oral hygiene tools, a regular toothbrush, an electronic toothbrush, and mouthwash, on the color stability of three different computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided manufactured (CAM) ceramic blocks. Feldspathic ceramic (Vita Triluxe Forte), hybrid resin ceramic (Vita Enamic), and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD) were used in this study. A CAD/CAM system and 81 (27 of each material) samples of ceramic blocks were used. All samples were immersed in black coffee for 15 days, and the coffee was changed twice per day. Using a spectrophotometer probe, samples on a grey background were scanned, and physical properties like surface hardness and depth were measured using interferometry and a 3D non-contact surface metrology. After 30 days of application of oral hygiene tools, instruments were used to measure various physical, mechanical, and optical properties. Vita Triluxe had the highest average color variation values (Δ E 00 ) after 15 and 30 days of immersion in coffee in both regular and electronic toothbrushes. Moreover, IPS e.max CAD had the least Δ E 00 values with no significant differences among the groups. The surface roughness (Ra) of the Vita Enamic ceramic increased when using a regular toothbrush, and the surface height (Rz) for the Vita Enamic ceramic increased when an electronic toothbrush was used. IPS e.max CAD had the greatest modules of elasticity forces, and Vita Triluxe Forte had the lowest when used with a regular toothbrush. The Δ E 00 values of the tested materials were minimally increased or decreased after 30 days of cleaning, and all were clinically acceptable. Ra and Rz were the highest for Vita Enamic in comparison to the other groups. The highest percentage in IPS e.max CAD was associated with a type 1 fracture, whereas type 3 was predominantly observed with Vita Enamic, and type 2 in the Vita Triluxe group without significant differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Nasser M. Al Ahmari & Maram A. Alahmari & Mohammed M. Al Moaleem & Raghad S. A. Alshahrani & Fatimah F. Alqahtani & Waad Saeed Mohammed & Bandar M. A. Al-Makramani & Vini Mehta & Aida Meto & Agron Met, 2022. "Physical, Optical, and Mechanical Properties of Ceramic Materials after Coffee Immersion and Evaluation of Cleaning Impact with Different Oral Hygiene Tools," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15047-:d:973680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15047/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15047/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15047-:d:973680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.