IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p14943-d971529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Vitiligo on Life Quality of Patients: Assessment of Currently Available Tools

Author

Listed:
  • Ting-Ting Yang

    (Department of Dermatology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
    Department of Dermatology, Pingtung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Pingtung 900, Taiwan)

  • Chien-Hung Lee

    (Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
    Research Center for Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan)

  • Cheng-Che E. Lan

    (Department of Dermatology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
    Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan)

Abstract

Background: How different tools for evaluating health-related quality of life (QoL) reflect the burden of vitiligo has rarely been compared. In this study, we aim to evaluate the impact of vitiligo on QoL using currently available tools. Methods: A single-center, cross-sectional study of vitiligo patients was performed. QoL was evaluated using the dermatology life quality index (DLQI), short form-36 (SF-36), and willingness to pay (WTP). As the original DLQI cutoff score (>10) indicating aginificantly impated QoL was found to underestimate QoL, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was use to determine a new cutoff point discriminating vitiligo patients with positive mental stress (SF-36 mental health ≤ 52). Results: Of the 143 patients enrolled, 24.5% were identified having significant mental stress by SF-36 mental health domain score ≤ 52 while there were only 13.3% patients with significantly hampered QoL indicated by DLQI >10. Using ROC analysis, DLQI ≥ 7 was found to be a more appropriate DLQI cutoff value for identifying mental stress in vitiligo patients. Additionally, the median WTP for treating vitiligo was comparable to other inflammatory skin diseases. Conclusions: There exist discrepancies in the outcomes identifying significant disease burden of vitiligo using DLQI and SF-36, making the current DLQI cutoff score (>10) for identifying significantly affected QoL inappropriate for these patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting-Ting Yang & Chien-Hung Lee & Cheng-Che E. Lan, 2022. "Impact of Vitiligo on Life Quality of Patients: Assessment of Currently Available Tools," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-10, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14943-:d:971529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14943/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14943/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moon Fai Chan & Tse Lert Chua & Boon Kee Goh & Chen Wee Derrick Aw & Tien Guan Steven Thng & Sze Min Lee, 2012. "Investigating factors associated with depression of vitiligo patients in Singapore," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(11‐12), pages 1614-1621, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14943-:d:971529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.