IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p14886-d970653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COVID-19 in Pregnancy: Knowledge about the Vaccine and the Effect of the Virus. Reliability and Results of the MAMA-19 Questionnaire

Author

Listed:
  • Alice Mannocci

    (Faculty of Economics, Universitas Mercatorum, Piazza Mattei 10, 00186 Rome, Italy)

  • Claudia Scaglione

    (Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy)

  • Giovanna Casella

    (Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy)

  • Antonio Lanzone

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
    Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy)

  • Giuseppe La Torre

    (Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Background: Fear or mistrust of the vaccine and concern for the well-being of their unborn infants are the main reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in pregnant women. The aim of this work was to validate a questionnaire on knowledge about COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and to examine the sources of information in a group of new mothers, as well as their effectiveness and intelligibility. Methods: A literature review was carried out to develop a questionnaire of forty-five questions, divided into six sections, called MAMA-19. The assessment of agreement and the interrater reliability was carried out using Cronbach’s analysis and Cohen’s kappa statistic. Data obtained from the questionnaire were analysed using descriptive and univariate statistics. Results: The total alpha values in the two sections about knowledge of vaccination during pregnancy and about the effects of disease and possible post-COVID-19 consequences for the unvaccinated showed sufficient consistency, at 0.860 and 0.725, respectively. Non-vaccinated women thought that receiving the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy can lead to malformations in the newborn (60% vs. 40%, p = 0.002) and to an increased risk of foetal growth restriction (61.9% vs. 38.1%, p < 0.001). The percentage of vaccinated women was significantly higher than non-vaccinated when more than one professional was consulted and consistent information was received from them (74.2% vs. 25.8%, p = 0.008). Conclusion: The MAMA-19 questionnaire shows results in line with the literature and valid in the two main sections. It is quick to use for measuring communication effectiveness by healthcare professionals and institutions in the context of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in the pregnant population. The results evidence that a physician’s recommendation to get vaccinated is the most important factor in maternal decision making, regardless of geographic, social or educational context.

Suggested Citation

  • Alice Mannocci & Claudia Scaglione & Giovanna Casella & Antonio Lanzone & Giuseppe La Torre, 2022. "COVID-19 in Pregnancy: Knowledge about the Vaccine and the Effect of the Virus. Reliability and Results of the MAMA-19 Questionnaire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14886-:d:970653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14886/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14886/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14886-:d:970653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.