IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p14875-d970421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-Guided Smartphone Application to Manage Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Chao Hsing Yeh

    (Cizik School of Nursing at UTHealth, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA)

  • Jennifer Kawi

    (School of Nursing, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA)

  • Lauren Grant

    (School of Nursing, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA)

  • Xinran Huang

    (School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA)

  • Hulin Wu

    (School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA)

  • Robin L. Hardwicke

    (McGovern School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
    School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA)

  • Paul J. Christo

    (School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA)

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of an auricular point acupressure smartphone app (mAPA) to self-manage chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methods: A prospective, longitudinal, randomized, controlled pilot trial was conducted using a three-group design (self-guided mAPA ( n = 14); in-person mAPA ( n = 12); and control ( n = 11)). The primary outcomes included physical function and pain intensity. Results: After a 4-week APA intervention, participants in the in-person mAPA group had improved physical function of 32% immediately post-intervention and 29% at the 1M follow-up. Participants in the self-guided mAPA group had higher improvement (42% at post-intervention and 48% at the 1M follow-up). Both mAPA groups had similar degrees of pain intensity relief at post-intervention (45% for in-person and 48% for the self-guided group) and the 1M follow-up (42% for in-person and 45% for the self-guided group). Over 50% of the participants in each group reached at least 30% reduced pain intensity at post-intervention, and this was sustained in the mAPA groups at the 1M follow-up. Approximately 80% of the participants in both mAPA groups were satisfied with the treatment outcomes and adhered to the suggested APA practice; however, participants in the self-guided group had higher duration and more frequency in APA use. The attrition rate was 16% at the 1M follow-up. No adverse effects of APA were reported, and participants found APA to be beneficial and the app to be valuable. Conclusions: The study findings indicate that participants effectively learned APA using a smartphone app, whether they were self-guided or received in-person training. They were able to self-administer APA to successfully manage their pain. Participants found APA to be valuable in their pain self-management and expressed satisfaction with the intervention using the app.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao Hsing Yeh & Jennifer Kawi & Lauren Grant & Xinran Huang & Hulin Wu & Robin L. Hardwicke & Paul J. Christo, 2022. "Self-Guided Smartphone Application to Manage Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14875-:d:970421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14875/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14875/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ron D. Hays & Dennis A. Revicki & David Feeny & Peter Fayers & Karen L. Spritzer & David Cella, 2016. "Using Linear Equating to Map PROMIS® Global Health Items and the PROMIS-29 V2.0 Profile Measure to the Health Utilities Index Mark 3," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(10), pages 1015-1022, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alina Palimaru & Ron D. Hays, 2017. "Associations of Health-Related Quality of Life with Overall Quality of Life in the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Project," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(2), pages 241-250, June.
    2. Steven P. Reise & Han Du & Emily F. Wong & Anne S. Hubbard & Mark G. Haviland, 2021. "Matching IRT Models to Patient-Reported Outcomes Constructs: The Graded Response and Log-Logistic Models for Scaling Depression," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 800-824, September.
    3. Admassu N. Lamu, 2020. "Does linear equating improve prediction in mapping? Crosswalking MacNew onto EQ-5D-5L value sets," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(6), pages 903-915, August.
    4. Lan Gao & Wei Luo & Utsana Tonmukayakul & Marj Moodie & Gang Chen, 2021. "Mapping MacNew Heart Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire onto country-specific EQ-5D-5L utility scores: a comparison of traditional regression models with a machine learning technique," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(2), pages 341-350, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14875-:d:970421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.