IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14539-d964458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy of Different Types of Physical Activity Interventions on Exercise Capacity in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Network Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Susana Priego-Jiménez

    (Hospital Virgen de la Luz, 16002 Cuenca, Spain)

  • Ana Torres-Costoso

    (Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, 16071 Cuenca, Spain
    Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing, University of Castilla La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain)

  • María José Guzmán-Pavón

    (Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, 16071 Cuenca, Spain
    Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing, University of Castilla La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain)

  • Patricia Lorenzo-García

    (Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, 16071 Cuenca, Spain
    Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing, University of Castilla La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain)

  • María Isabel Lucerón-Lucas-Torres

    (Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, 16071 Cuenca, Spain
    Facultad de Enfermería de Cuenca, Edificio Melchor Cano, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 16071 Cuenca, Spain)

  • Celia Álvarez-Bueno

    (Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, 16071 Cuenca, Spain
    Universidad Politécnica y Artística del Paraguay, Asunción 2024, Paraguay)

Abstract

Aim: A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to determine the effects on the exercise capacity, measured by the 6 MWT, of patients with COPD of (i) different physical activity interventions and (ii) supervised or unsupervised programs. Methods: A literature search was carried out from inception to April 2022. Randomized controlled trials of the effectiveness of physical activity on exercise capacity in patients with COPD were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) tool, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool (GRADE) was used to assess the quality of the evidence. A pairwise meta-analysis for direct and indirect effects was carried out. Results: A total of 41 studies were included in this NMA. The highest effects were for urban training pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs (ES, 1.50; 95% CI: 0.46 and 2.55) versus the control group. For supervised and unsupervised PR and home-based PR programs, the highest effects were found for supervised PR (ES, 0.85; 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.23) versus the control group. Conclusions: PR implemented with urban circuit training should be considered the most effective strategy to improve exercise capacity in patients with COPD. Supervision of the programs improves exercise capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Susana Priego-Jiménez & Ana Torres-Costoso & María José Guzmán-Pavón & Patricia Lorenzo-García & María Isabel Lucerón-Lucas-Torres & Celia Álvarez-Bueno, 2022. "Efficacy of Different Types of Physical Activity Interventions on Exercise Capacity in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Network Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-24, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14539-:d:964458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14539/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14539/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14539-:d:964458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.