IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14422-d962654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurse Leadership and Work Environment Association with Outcome Expectancy and Self-Efficacy in Evidence-Based Practice among Hospital Nurses in The Netherlands: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Hoegen

    (School of Health and Social Care, Avans University of Applied Science, Hogeschoollaan 1, 4818 CR Breda, The Netherlands)

  • Mireille Vos

    (Bachelor of Nursing, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, De Boelelaan 1109, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Catharina van Oostveen

    (Research Department, Spaarne Gasthuis, Spaarnepoort 1, 2134 TM Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
    Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Research and Education in Nursing Consortium (RE-Nurse), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC Tilburg, The Netherlands)

  • Cindy de Bot

    (School of Health and Social Care, Avans University of Applied Science, Hogeschoollaan 1, 4818 CR Breda, The Netherlands)

  • Michael A. Echteld

    (School of Health and Social Care, Avans University of Applied Science, Hogeschoollaan 1, 4818 CR Breda, The Netherlands)

  • Jolanda Maaskant

    (Master EBP in Healthcare, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Hester Vermeulen

    (Research and Education in Nursing Consortium (RE-Nurse), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC Tilburg, The Netherlands
    Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Kapittelweg 54, 6525 EP Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The active participation of nurses in evidence-based practice (EBP) is challenging and topical, as shown by the worldwide calls for appropriate, accessible, affordable care and the de-implementation of unnecessary care. Nurses’ perceived support from their managers and work environments may affect their self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in EBP, as well as hinder them in EBP. Associations between these issues have not yet been explored. This study examines the association of self-efficacy and outcome expectancy levels in EBP, as well as the perceived support for EBP from nurse leaders and in the working environment, among Dutch hospital nurses. Methods. Questionnaires measuring nurses’ self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and perceived support for EBP from nurse leaders and their work environment were completed by 306 nurses in eight hospitals between March 2021 and June 2021. We used multilevel regression analyses to determine the associations and covariates. Results. This study shows that EBP-supportive leaders and work environments positively contribute to nurses’ self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in EBP, along with the covariates undertaking EBP activities and educational level. Conclusions. To improve nurses’ active participation in EBP, nurses need to increase their self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in EBP. Supportive leaders and a supportive work environment do have an impact. Hence, these factors need attention when implementing EBP among nurses.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Hoegen & Mireille Vos & Catharina van Oostveen & Cindy de Bot & Michael A. Echteld & Jolanda Maaskant & Hester Vermeulen, 2022. "Nurse Leadership and Work Environment Association with Outcome Expectancy and Self-Efficacy in Evidence-Based Practice among Hospital Nurses in The Netherlands: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-10, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14422-:d:962654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14422/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14422/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14422-:d:962654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.