IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14344-d961211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety Climate Evaluation in Primary Health Care: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Marlene Manuela Moreira Ferreira

    (Family Health Unit Caldas da Saúde, ACeS Grande Porto I-Santo Tirso/Trofa, 4780-030 Santo Tirso, Portugal)

  • Andreia Sofia Costa Teixeira

    (Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
    Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
    ADiT-LAB, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4900-367 Viana do Castelo, Portugal)

  • Tiago Salgado de Magalhães Taveira-Gomes

    (Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
    Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
    Faculty of Health Sciences, University Fernando Pessoa (FCS-UFP), 4200-150 Porto, Portugal
    MTG Research and Development Lab, 4200-604 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

The perception of the existence of deficits in patient safety, the associated costs and the limitation of resources have made it essential to define improvement strategies. Important concepts have emerged, such as safety climate, which evaluates the perceptions of safety status held by professionals in relation to their organization. The aim of this study is to characterize the safety climate in primary health care (PHC) using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ)—Short Form 2006 PT and to assess associations between SAQ-Short Form 2006 PT scores and demographic and professional characteristics. A cross-sectional study was conducted in all public PHC units in the northern region of Portugal. Data were collected through an online questionnaire shared via institutional emails and by means of a snowball approach. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis were performed. Statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05. A total of 649/7427 (8.7%) responses were included in the analyses. The mean and median total SAQ-Short Form 2006 PT scores were 69.23 (SD = 15.73, range 22.22–100.00) and 71.53 [59.03; 79.86], respectively. This is the first study to assess the safety climate in PHC in Portugal. The median obtained total SAQ-Short Form 2006 PT score was 71.53 [59.03; 79.86], which is below the threshold of ≥75, indicating safety deficits.

Suggested Citation

  • Marlene Manuela Moreira Ferreira & Andreia Sofia Costa Teixeira & Tiago Salgado de Magalhães Taveira-Gomes, 2022. "Safety Climate Evaluation in Primary Health Care: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14344-:d:961211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14344/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14344/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Montserrat Gens-Barberà & Núria Hernández-Vidal & Elisa Vidal-Esteve & Yolanda Mengíbar-García & Immaculada Hospital-Guardiola & Eva M. Oya-Girona & Ferran Bejarano-Romero & Carles Castro-Muniain & Ev, 2021. "Analysis of Patient Safety Incidents in Primary Care Reported in an Electronic Registry Application," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14344-:d:961211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.