IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14015-d955595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness of the Polish Version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI-PL) in Patients after Arthroscopic Repair for Shoulder Instability

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Bejer

    (Institute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Rejtana 16C, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland
    The Holy Family Specialist Hospital, Rudna Mała 600, 36-060 Głogów Małopolski, Poland)

  • Jędrzej Płocki

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Collegium Medicum, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Sucharskiego 2, 35-225 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Marek Kulczyk

    (The Holy Family Specialist Hospital, Rudna Mała 600, 36-060 Głogów Małopolski, Poland)

  • Sharon Griffin

    (Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, 3M Centre, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada)

  • Ireneusz Kotela

    (Institute of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, The Jan Kochanowski University, IX Wieków Kielc 19a, 25-317 Kielce, Poland
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior, Wołoska 137, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Andrzej Kotela

    (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior, Wołoska 137, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland
    Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Woycickiego 1/3, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Apart from imaging and physical examination for shoulder instability (SI), medical history with patient feedback should be considered to assess the patient’s condition and recovery. The aim of this study was to evaluate psychometric properties of the Polish version of Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)—one of the most frequently used patient-reported outcome measures for SI. During examination 1, 74 patients after arthroscopic repair for SI (age x ¯ = 30.01 ± 8.98) were tested. Examinations 2 and 3 involved 71 and 51 patients, respectively. They completed the Polish version of the WOSI, the shortened version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH), the Short Form-36 version 2.0 (SF-36 v. 2.0) and 7-point Global Rating Change scale (GRC). The WOSI-PL demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha for total = 0.94), and test–retest reliability (Total ICC 2,1 = 0.99). High construct validity was found (89%) as the a priori hypotheses were confirmed. All domains and total scores of WOSI-PL showed a moderate to strong degree of responsiveness (ES = 0.37–0.44; SMR = 0.87–1.26). Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Total WOSI-PL was 126.43 points/6% (95%CI 67.83–185.03) by the anchor-based method and 174.05 points/8% (95%CI 138.61–233.98) by the distribution-based method. The Polish version of the WOSI can be considered a reliable, valid and responsive PROM. It is recommended for assessing the quality of life in patients after arthroscopic repair for SI and can be applied in research and in the clinical setting for monitoring treatment and facilitating patient-centred therapeutic decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Bejer & Jędrzej Płocki & Marek Kulczyk & Sharon Griffin & Ireneusz Kotela & Andrzej Kotela, 2022. "Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness of the Polish Version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI-PL) in Patients after Arthroscopic Repair for Shoulder Instability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14015-:d:955595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14015/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14015/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14015-:d:955595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.