IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p13984-d955062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels

Author

Listed:
  • Dev Crasta

    (Center of Excellence for Suicide Prevention, Department of Veterans Affairs, Canandaigua, NY 14424, USA
    Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA)

  • Cory A. Crane

    (College of Health Science and Technology, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA
    Center for Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA)

  • Nicole Trabold

    (College of Health Science and Technology, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA)

  • Robyn L. Shepardson

    (Center for Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
    Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA)

  • Kyle Possemato

    (Center for Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
    Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA)

  • Jennifer S. Funderburk

    (Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
    Center for Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
    Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA)

Abstract

This study explores differences in characteristics and relationship treatment preferences across different levels of intimate partner violence (IPV) among Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care patients. In Fall 2019, we sent a mail-in survey assessing relationship healthcare needs to N = 299 Veterans randomly sampled from 20 northeastern VA primary care clinics (oversampling female and younger Veterans). We compared those reporting past year use or experience of physical/sexual aggression, threats/coercion, or injury (Severe IPV; 21%), to those only reporting yelling and screaming (Verbal Conflict; 51%), and denying any IPV (No IPV; 28%). Participants across groups desired 2–6 sessions of face-to-face support for couples’ health and communication. No IPV participants were older and had preferred treatment in primary care. The Verbal Conflict and Severe IPV groups were both flagged by IPV screens and had similar interest in couple treatment and relationship evaluation. The Severe IPV group had higher rates of harms (e.g., depression, alcohol use disorder, relationship dissatisfaction, fear of partner) and higher interest in addressing safety outside of VA. Exploratory analyses suggested differences based on use vs. experience of Severe IPV. Findings highlight ways integrated primary care teams can differentiate services to address dissatisfaction and conflict while facilitating referrals for Severe IPV.

Suggested Citation

  • Dev Crasta & Cory A. Crane & Nicole Trabold & Robyn L. Shepardson & Kyle Possemato & Jennifer S. Funderburk, 2022. "Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13984-:d:955062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13984/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13984/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicole Trabold & Paul R. King & Dev Crasta & Katherine M. Iverson & Cory A. Crane & Katherine Buckheit & Stephen C. Bosco & Jennifer S. Funderburk, 2023. "Leveraging Integrated Primary Care to Enhance the Health System Response to IPV: Moving toward Primary Prevention Primary Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-12, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13984-:d:955062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.