IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p13911-d953561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ophthalmology Practice and Social Media Influences: A Patients Based Cross-Sectional Study among Social Media Users

Author

Listed:
  • Hani B. ALBalawi

    (Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia)

  • Osama Alraddadi

    (Ohud Hospital, Ministry of Health, Medina 41412, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Many physicians consider social media a good tool for building their brands and attracting patients. However, limited data exist on patients’ perceptions of the value of social media in ophthalmology. Therefore, our objective was to examine how social media influences patients when choosing an ophthalmologist among social media users, and people’s behaviors toward ophthalmologists’ social media accounts. This was a cross-sectional study including 1086 participants. Males represented 77.3% of the sample. The majority of the participants (71.3%) were aged between 25 and 54 years. Regarding social media sites frequently checked, Twitter ranked first (75.3%), followed by Snapchat (52.8%) and YouTube (48.7%). The majority (92.3%) used social media sites at all times of the day. Concerning the importance of ophthalmologists’ social media sites, around 36.3% considered it either very or extremely important. As regards the important factors about an ophthalmologist’s social media site from participants’ perspectives, medical information written by the ophthalmologist (45.5%) and recommendations by friends (45.4%) were the most common reasons. Around 21% of females, compared to 16.8% of males, perceived the ophthalmologists’ social media sites as extremely important, p = 0.041. A quarter of participants aged between 18 and 24 years, compared to only 5.5% of those aged 65 and above, perceived the ophthalmologists’ social media sites as extremely important, p = 0.018. In conclusion, a considerable proportion of the people who used social media described ophthalmologists’ social media sites as very/extremely important in their choice of an ophthalmologist.

Suggested Citation

  • Hani B. ALBalawi & Osama Alraddadi, 2022. "Ophthalmology Practice and Social Media Influences: A Patients Based Cross-Sectional Study among Social Media Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-9, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13911-:d:953561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13911/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13911/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13911-:d:953561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.