IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13529-d946766.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Evaluation of Screening Strategy for Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) in Contacts of Tuberculosis Patients: Systematic Review and Quality Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Panida Yoopetch

    (Mahidol University Health Technology Assessment (MUHTA) Graduate Program, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

  • Natthakan Chitpim

    (Social, Economic, and Administrative Pharmacy Graduate Program, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

  • Jiraphun Jittikoon

    (Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

  • Wanvisa Udomsinprasert

    (Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

  • Montarat Thavorncharoensap

    (Mahidol University Health Technology Assessment (MUHTA) Graduate Program, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
    Social Administrative Pharmacy Division, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

  • Sitaporn Youngkong

    (Mahidol University Health Technology Assessment (MUHTA) Graduate Program, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
    Social Administrative Pharmacy Division, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

  • Naiyana Praditsitthikorn

    (Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Surakameth Mahasirimongkol

    (Department of Medical Sciences, Medical Genetics Center, Medical Life Sciences Institute, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Usa Chaikledkaew

    (Mahidol University Health Technology Assessment (MUHTA) Graduate Program, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
    Social Administrative Pharmacy Division, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

Abstract

A tuberculin skin test (TST) or interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) can be used to screen for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Due to its low cost, TST has been used particularly in underdeveloped countries. The limitations of TST were poor specificity in populations with a high prevalence of Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination and variability of test readers. IGRA is used as an alternative to TST in settings where higher costs can be supported. The lack of studies conducted in high TB incidence countries since previous review, and using relevant assessment tools of the quality appraisal make the need for updated studies and a more comprehensive systematic review. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of published economic evaluations of screening strategies for LTBI in contacts of TB patients, assess the quality of these studies, and compare the assessment results related to a country’s income level in order to provide information to other countries. The databases were searched in January 2022 including MEDLINE and Scopus. Two independent reviewers evaluated the included studies based on eligibility criteria, data extraction, and quality assessment. Eleven economic evaluations of LTBI diagnostic tests in TB contacts were included. Most studies were conducted in high-income countries (91%) and used cost-effectiveness analysis methods (73%). The quality assessment of reporting and data sources was appropriate, ranging from 71% to 89%. Interventions varied from study to study. The outcomes were cost per life years gained (27%), cost per quality-adjusted life year gained (27%), cost per TB case prevented (36%), and cost per close contact case (10%). In high-income countries which were not countries with high TB burden, the use of IGRA alone for screening TB contacts was cost-effective, whereas TST was cost-effective in only two studies. In comparison to TST, IGRA could reduce false-positive results, resulting in fewer patients undergoing TB treatment and preventive treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Panida Yoopetch & Natthakan Chitpim & Jiraphun Jittikoon & Wanvisa Udomsinprasert & Montarat Thavorncharoensap & Sitaporn Youngkong & Naiyana Praditsitthikorn & Surakameth Mahasirimongkol & Usa Chaikl, 2022. "Economic Evaluation of Screening Strategy for Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) in Contacts of Tuberculosis Patients: Systematic Review and Quality Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13529-:d:946766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13529/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13529/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13529-:d:946766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.