IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13348-d943756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact on the Stress-Associated Autonomic Response of Physiotherapy Students Receiving Interferential Current in an Electrotherapy Training Session

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Espejo-Antúnez

    (Department of Medical-Surgical Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Extremadura, 06006 Badajoz, Spain)

  • Carlos Fernández-Morales

    (Department of Medical-Surgical Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Extremadura, 06006 Badajoz, Spain)

  • Sergio Hernández-Sánchez

    (Department of Pathology and Surgery (Area of Physiotherapy), Faculty of Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, 03550 Alicante, Spain)

  • María de los Ángeles Cardero-Durán

    (Department of Medical-Surgical Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Extremadura, 06006 Badajoz, Spain)

  • José Vicente Toledo-Marhuenda

    (Department of Pathology and Surgery (Area of Physiotherapy), Faculty of Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, 03550 Alicante, Spain)

  • Manuel Albornoz-Cabello

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physical Therapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain)

Abstract

Electrical currents are didactic contents widely applied in the training of physiotherapy students, but the treatment is considered a stressful situation for both the patient who receives it and the student who applies it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress-associated autonomic response of physiotherapy students receiving interferential current by measuring and analysing heart rate variability. An observational case–control study was conducted. Ninety healthy male volunteers, all physiotherapy degree students, were enrolled while attending laboratory practice during the 2020–2021 academic year. Participants were randomly allocated to a sham electrotherapy group (44 subjects), in which heart rate variability was recorded for 10 min, both at rest and during the application of sham technique on the lower back (10 min), and an electrotherapy group (46 subjects), applying the same procedure with the electrical current flowing. Outcome measures included baseline (seated position) and postintervention (prone position) time domain parameter, diameters of the Poincaré plot 1 and 2, stress score, and sympathetic/parasympathetic ratio. The sham electrotherapy group exhibited significant increases in time domain parameter ( p = 0.027) and diameters of the Poincaré plot 1 ( p = 0.032), with a small effect size (d ≤ 0.5). The electrotherapy group exhibited significant increases in time domain parameter and diameters of the Poincaré plot 1 and 2 ( p < 0.001) and decreases in the stress score and sympathetic/parasympathetic ratio ( p < 0.001), with a large effect size (d > 0.8) other than for the time domain parameter (d = 0.42), indicating increased parasympathetic and decreased sympathetic activity. After interventions, there were significant differences between groups in diameters of the Poincaré plot 2 ( p < 0.001), stress score ( p = 0.01) and sympathetic/parasympathetic ratio ( p = 0.003), with moderate effect size (d > 0.5). The application of the interferential current technique produces stress-associated autonomic response characterized by greater parasympathetic activity and decreased sympathetic activity. Further studies are needed to determine possible adverse effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Espejo-Antúnez & Carlos Fernández-Morales & Sergio Hernández-Sánchez & María de los Ángeles Cardero-Durán & José Vicente Toledo-Marhuenda & Manuel Albornoz-Cabello, 2022. "The Impact on the Stress-Associated Autonomic Response of Physiotherapy Students Receiving Interferential Current in an Electrotherapy Training Session," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13348-:d:943756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13348/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13348/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13348-:d:943756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.