IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13207-d941722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Associated with Using Telemedicine in the Primary Care Clinics during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Israel

Author

Listed:
  • Orna Reges

    (Department of Health System Management, Ariel University, Ariel 477625, Israel
    Branch of Planning and Strategy, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv 6209804, Israel)

  • Ilan Feldhamer

    (Branch of Planning and Strategy, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv 6209804, Israel)

  • Yael Wolff Sagy

    (Branch of Planning and Strategy, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv 6209804, Israel)

  • Gil Lavie

    (Branch of Planning and Strategy, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv 6209804, Israel
    Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel)

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic generated an extraordinary need for telemedicine. Objective: To identify the factors and multi-way interactions associated with telemedicine use in primary healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This population-based study included all members (2,722,773) aged ≥18 years of the largest healthcare organization in Israel who used primary care clinic services between 1 March 2020 and 31 December 2021. Individuals were classified as telemedicine users (≥1 phone/video visits or asynchronous encounters) or non-telemedicine users (only in-person encounter/s). Results: Ethnicity was the most discriminative variable associated with telemedicine use, with 85% and 52% users among Jews and Arabs, respectively. Higher odds for telemedicine utilization were observed among women, residents of urban areas, those confined to home, individuals with high level of technology literacy, residents of the central area (in Jews only), young Jews, and older Arabs. Based on decision tree analysis, the segments of the population with the lowest telemedicine use were characterized by lower primary care needs and comorbidities, as well as low technology literacy. The proportion of telemedicine use in these groups was 56% and 27% in Jews and in Arabs, respectively. Conclusion: A proactive intervention program should be applied among populations who are less likely to use telemedicine in the primary care clinics, including Arabs, Jews who live in the distant periphery, and individuals with low technology literacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Orna Reges & Ilan Feldhamer & Yael Wolff Sagy & Gil Lavie, 2022. "Factors Associated with Using Telemedicine in the Primary Care Clinics during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Israel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-11, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13207-:d:941722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13207/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13207/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oren Miron & Yael Wolff Sagy & Shlomit Yaron & Noga Ramot & Gil Lavie, 2022. "Trends in the Volume and Types of Primary Care Visits during the Two Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Israel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Keren Dopelt & Nofar Avni & Yana Haimov-Sadikov & Iris Golan & Nadav Davidovitch, 2021. "Telemedicine and eHealth Literacy in the Era of COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Peripheral Clinic in Israel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wolfgang Frimmel & Gerald J. Pruckner, 2024. "The COVID-19 pandemic and health care utilization: Evidence from Austrian register data," Economics working papers 2024-03, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta Marsilio & Martina Pisarra & Magda Giulia Santini & Elisabetta Mancini & Carlo Nicora & Michele Torresani, 2022. "Tele-oncologia: dalla cura alla ricerca. Il caso dell?IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(123), pages 133-147.
    2. Munshi Muhammad Abdul Kader Jilani & Md. Moniruzzaman & Mouri Dey & Edris Alam & Md. Aftab Uddin, 2022. "Strengthening the Trialability for the Intention to Use of mHealth Apps Amidst Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13207-:d:941722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.