IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13004-d939146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Associations between Source of Cancer Information and Mammography Behavior among Black Church-Going Women

Author

Listed:
  • Brian J. Carter

    (Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
    Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, 491 Farish Hall, Houston, TX 77204, USA)

  • Tzuan A. Chen

    (Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, 491 Farish Hall, Houston, TX 77204, USA
    HEALTH Research Institute, University of Houston, 4349 Martin Luther King Boulevard, Houston, TX 77204, USA)

  • Dalnim Cho

    (Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA)

  • Shahnjayla K. Connors

    (Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, 491 Farish Hall, Houston, TX 77204, USA
    Department of Social Sciences, University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, TX 77002, USA)

  • Ammar D. Siddiqi

    (Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
    Department of Biosciences, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005, USA)

  • Lorna H. McNeill

    (Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA)

  • Lorraine R. Reitzel

    (Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
    Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, 491 Farish Hall, Houston, TX 77204, USA)

Abstract

Black women have a slightly lower breast cancer incidence rate than White women, but breast cancer mortality is approximately 40% higher among Black women than among White women. Early detection by mammography may improve survival outcomes. Outlets providing information on cancer and cancer screening often present data, including mammography recommendations, that are unreliable, accessible, and/or inconsistent. We examined associations between sources of cancer information and mammography behavior among Black church-going women. A logistic regression model was used to examine associations between self-reported preferred source of cancer information (provider, cancer organization, social network, internet, or other media (e.g., books, magazines)) and self-reported most recent source of cancer information (same categories as preferred sources), respectively, and having received a mammogram within the prior 12 months. Participants were 832 Black women over 40 years old, recruited from three churches in Houston, Texas. Data were collected in 2012. Overall, 55.41% of participants indicated their preferred source of cancer information was a provider, 21.88% the internet, 11.54% other media, 10.22% a cancer organization, and 0.96% their social network. In contrast, 17.88% of participants indicated their most recent source of cancer information was a provider, 63.02% the internet, 12.04% other media, 4.50% a cancer organization, and 2.55% their social network. About 70% of participants indicated receiving a mammogram in the prior 12 months. Results indicated that women who most recently sought information from the internet had lower odds of having a mammogram than those who most recently sought information from a provider (aOR: 0.546, CI 95% : 0.336–0.886, p = 0.014). These results reveal an opportunity to advance health equity by encouraging Black church-going women to obtain cancer information from providers rather than from the internet as a method to enhance mammography use. These results also reveal an opportunity to investigate what modifiable social determinants or other factors prevent Black church-going women from seeking cancer information from their preferred source, which was a provider for the majority of the sample, and designing interventions to better actualize this preference.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian J. Carter & Tzuan A. Chen & Dalnim Cho & Shahnjayla K. Connors & Ammar D. Siddiqi & Lorna H. McNeill & Lorraine R. Reitzel, 2022. "Examining Associations between Source of Cancer Information and Mammography Behavior among Black Church-Going Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13004-:d:939146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13004/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13004/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leslie W. Ross & Julie S. Townsend & Elizabeth A. Rohan, 2022. "Still Lost in Transition? Perspectives of Ongoing Cancer Survivorship Care Needs from Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs, Survivors, and Health Care Providers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Maria Magdalena Bujnowska-Fedak & Paulina Węgierek, 2020. "The Impact of Online Health Information on Patient Health Behaviours and Making Decisions Concerning Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Pooja Agrawal & Tzuan A. Chen & Lorna H. McNeill & Chiara Acquati & Shahnjayla K. Connors & Vijay Nitturi & Angelica S. Robinson & Isabel Martinez Leal & Lorraine R. Reitzel, 2021. "Factors Associated with Breast Cancer Screening Adherence among Church-Going African American Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Lemmo & Maria Luisa Martino & Anna Rosa Donizzetti & Maria Francesca Freda & Daniela Caso, 2022. "The Relationship between Healthcare Providers and Preventive Practices: Narratives on Access to Cancer Screening," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Maria Magdalena Bujnowska-Fedak & Łukasz Wysoczański, 2020. "Access to an Electronic Health Record: A Polish National Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Karol Król & Dariusz Zdonek, 2021. "The Quality of Infectious Disease Hospital Websites in Poland in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. María Esther González-Revuelta & Nuria Novas & Jose Antonio Gázquez & Manuel Ángel Rodríguez-Maresca & Juan Manuel García-Torrecillas, 2022. "User Perception of New E-Health Challenges: Implications for the Care Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Adnan Muhammad Shah & Mudassar Ali & Abdul Qayyum & Abida Begum & Heesup Han & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Luis Araya-Castillo, 2021. "Exploring the Impact of Linguistic Signals Transmission on Patients’ Health Consultation Choice: Web Mining of Online Reviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Martina Torreggiani & Deborah Maselli & Stefania Costi & Monica Guberti, 2024. "Models of Care in Providing Comprehensive Healthcare on Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review with a TIDieR Checklist Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-25, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13004-:d:939146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.