IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13000-d938621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-Reported Experiences of Midwives Working in the UK across Three Phases during COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Susan McGrory

    (School of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Magee Campus, Ulster University, Londonderry BT48 7JL, UK)

  • Ruth D. Neill

    (School of Medicine, Ulster University, Londonderry BT48 7JL, UK)

  • Patricia Gillen

    (School of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Belfast Campus, Ulster University, Belfast BT15 1ED, UK
    Southern Health and Social Care Trust, 10 Moyallen Road, Gilford BT63 5JX, UK)

  • Paula McFadden

    (School of Applied Social Policy Sciences, Magee Campus, Ulster University, Londonderry BT48 7JL, UK)

  • Jill Manthorpe

    (NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, King’s College London, 22 Kingsway, Holborn, London WC2B 6LE, UK)

  • Jermaine Ravalier

    (School of Science, Bath Spa University, Newton Park, Newton St Loe, Bath BA2 9BN, UK)

  • John Mallett

    (School of Psychology, Coleraine Campus, Ulster University, Cromore Road, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK)

  • Heike Schroder

    (Queen’s Management School, Queen’s University Belfast, 185 Stranmillis Road, Belfast BT9 5EE, UK)

  • Denise Currie

    (Queen’s Management School, Queen’s University Belfast, 185 Stranmillis Road, Belfast BT9 5EE, UK)

  • John Moriarty

    (School of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen’s University Belfast, 69-71 University Street, Belfast BT7 1HL, UK)

  • Patricia Nicholl

    (School of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen’s University Belfast, 69-71 University Street, Belfast BT7 1HL, UK)

Abstract

Maternity services cannot be postponed due to the nature of this service, however, the pandemic resulted in wide-ranging and significant changes to working practices and services. This paper aims to describe UK midwives’ experiences of working during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study forms part of a larger multiple phase research project using a cross-sectional design based on an online survey. The online survey used validated psychometric tools to measure work-related quality of life, wellbeing, coping, and burnout as well as open-ended questions to further understand the experiences of staff working during the pandemic. This paper reports the qualitative data collected from the open-ended questions. The qualitative data were subjected to thematic analysis and the four main themes that emerged were ‘relentless stress/pressure’, ‘reconfiguration of services’, ‘protection of self and others’, and ‘workforce challenges’. The key conclusions were that midwives experienced a reduction in quality of working life and significant stress throughout the pandemic due to a range of factors including staffing shortages, restrictions placed on women’s partners, changes to services and management support, all of which compounded workforce pressures that existed prior to the pandemic. This research recommends consultation of front-line midwives in relation to possible changes in practice and workforce planning in preparation for crises such as a pandemic and to ensure equitable and supportive management with access to practical and psychological support.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan McGrory & Ruth D. Neill & Patricia Gillen & Paula McFadden & Jill Manthorpe & Jermaine Ravalier & John Mallett & Heike Schroder & Denise Currie & John Moriarty & Patricia Nicholl, 2022. "Self-Reported Experiences of Midwives Working in the UK across Three Phases during COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13000-:d:938621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13000/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13000/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Josefina Goberna-Tricas & Ainoa Biurrun-Garrido & Carme Perelló-Iñiguez & Pía Rodríguez-Garrido, 2021. "The COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain: Experiences of Midwives on the Healthcare Frontline," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-23, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13000-:d:938621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.