IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12927-d937458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ Quality of Life and Healthy Behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Orszulak

    (Student Research Group in Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-618 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Klaudia Kubiak

    (Student Research Group in Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-618 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Adam Kowal

    (Student Research Group in Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-618 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Michał Czapla

    (Department of Emergency Medical Service, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-616 Wroclaw, Poland
    Institute of Heart Diseases, University Hospital, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland
    Group of Research in Care (GRUPAC), Faculty of Nursing, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logrono, Spain)

  • Izabella Uchmanowicz

    (Institute of Heart Diseases, University Hospital, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland
    Department of Nursing and Obstetrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-618 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

Quality of life (QoL) is closely linked to the health status of the individual. In turn, health status strongly depends on lifestyle. Health behavior, which is defined as the actions and attitudes of a person that affect their physical and mental health, is one of many lifestyle components. The nursing community, which is exposed to a range of dangers associated with the job position and responsibilities of the nursing profession, has to contend with several negative impacts. This results in a decreased quality of life among the nursing staff and reduced effectiveness in providing care services to patients. Methods: This study was conducted using an online Google questionnaire, which was completed by 312 nurses nationwide. The questionnaire included questions about the respondents’ socio-demographic survey and included the Health Behavior Inventory (HBI) by Juczyński and the WHOQoL-BREF questionnaire. Results: The mean QoL reported by respondents was 3.65 points (SD = 0.67), meaning that QoL ranked between good and average results. The respondents’ mean rating of their own health was 3.58 points (SD = 0.79), indicating that they rated their health status between satisfactory and average. Low health-behavior prevalence was reported by 139 of the 312 survey participants (44.55%), while 111 respondents (35.58%) had average health-behavior prevalence and 62 (19.87%) had high health-behavior prevalence. Each of the QoL domains correlated significantly ( p ˂ 0.05) and positively (r ˃ 0) with the total HBI score and all its subscales. Conclusions: Higher quality of life improves the level of health behavior by nursing staff. Obesity lowers the quality of life in physical, psychological, and social domains. The psychological sphere was the best-rated quality of life domain by nurses. A good material situation for nurses has a positive effect on their quality of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Orszulak & Klaudia Kubiak & Adam Kowal & Michał Czapla & Izabella Uchmanowicz, 2022. "Nurses’ Quality of Life and Healthy Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12927-:d:937458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12927/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12927/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samira Jafari & Azizollah Batebi & Mostafa Hosseini & Mitra Ebrahimpoor & Maryam Vaezi Fatemeh Shojaei, 2012. "The Effects of Occupational Stress on Quality of Life and Associated Factors among Hospital Nurses in Iran," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 3(6), pages 194-202.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12927-:d:937458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.