IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12847-d935644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multicentric Study to Assess Helicobacter pylori Incidence, Patient Reported Adverse Events, Compliance and Effectiveness, in Real-World Setting

Author

Listed:
  • André Mesquita

    (USF Sanus Carandá, ACeS Cávado I-Braga, 4715-402 Braga, Portugal)

  • Carlos Rocha-Castro

    (USF do Minho, ACeS Cávado I-Braga, 4715-402 Braga, Portugal)

  • Daniela Guimarães

    (USF Dr. Pelaez Carones, ACeS Cávado I-Braga, 4715-402 Braga, Portugal)

  • Joana Costa

    (USF Gualtar, ACeS Cávado I-Braga, 4710-078 Braga, Portugal)

  • Joana Soutinho

    (USF MaxiSaúde, ACeS Cávado I-Braga, 4700-036 Braga, Portugal)

  • Tiago Taveira-Gomes

    (MTG Research and Development Lab, 4200-604 Porto, Portugal
    Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
    Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
    Faculty of Health Sciences, University Fernando Pessoa (FCS-UFP), 4249-004 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) plays an important role in chronic gastritis and globally it is estimated to be present in half of the world’s population. In Portugal, prevalence reaches 85% and its eradication is recommended using quadruple antibiotic therapy, with or without bismuth. We intended to characterize the prescribed treatments evaluating effectiveness, adverse outcomes and compliance in a real-world setting in a primary care unit. A prospective multicenter observational cohort study was developed in five primary care units of Braga, Portugal. Patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection from August 2021 to January 2022 were included. Data were collected by interview (3 weeks after treatment) and review of medical records. Comparison between two groups of treatment and multivariable analysis was conducted. We estimated 13.4 cases per 1000 adults/year from 185 diagnoses. Therapy with bismuth was the most prescribed (83.8%) with a 96.7% eradication rate. There were no significant differences between treatments. Adverse events were reported in 73.8% of inquiries and female patients were associated with higher reports of nausea ( p = 0.03) and metallic taste ( p = 0.02). Both eradication schemes were effective and secure. The higher rate of adverse outcomes should be validated but it could influence the debate concerning treating all patients, especially in low gastric cancer-prevalence regions.

Suggested Citation

  • André Mesquita & Carlos Rocha-Castro & Daniela Guimarães & Joana Costa & Joana Soutinho & Tiago Taveira-Gomes, 2022. "Multicentric Study to Assess Helicobacter pylori Incidence, Patient Reported Adverse Events, Compliance and Effectiveness, in Real-World Setting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12847-:d:935644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12847/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12847/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12847-:d:935644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.