IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12648-d932645.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surveying and Modelling 21st Century Online Learning Patterns of Medical Students

Author

Listed:
  • Siya Liang

    (Centre for Learning Enhancement and Research (CLEAR), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Ching Sing Chai

    (Faculty of Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Vivian W. Y. Lee

    (Centre for Learning Enhancement and Research (CLEAR), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Medical education in the 21st century is shifting more toward online learning because of extensive application of information and communication technology (ICT). We surveyed medical students’ 21st century online learning experiences and modeled the interrelations among relevant dimensions of 21st century online learning. Based on the general themes proposed by multiple 21st century learning frameworks and current medical education emphases, a seven-factor instrument was developed for surveying 364 medical students’ learning process, thinking process, and basic science-related clinical ability. The associations among the seven factors and the structural relationships of how online learning practices and thinking processes affected basic science-related clinical ability were explored. The developed instrument was validated and possessed good reliability. The seven dimensions were interrelated. Specifically, meaningful learning with ICT was positively associated with other learning practices. The learning practices were positively associated with the thinking processes and the thinking processes were positively associated with students’ basic science-related clinical ability. Our findings suggested that students engaged in active and collaborative learning with technology would employ higher-order thinking and perceived better basic science-related clinical ability. The findings support engaging medical students with 21st century learning practices to strengthen students’ self-perception of clinical ability.

Suggested Citation

  • Siya Liang & Ching Sing Chai & Vivian W. Y. Lee, 2022. "Surveying and Modelling 21st Century Online Learning Patterns of Medical Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12648-:d:932645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12648/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12648/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12648-:d:932645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.