IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12647-d932640.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Qualitative Systematic Review of Access to Substance Use Disorder Care in the United States Criminal Justice System

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel E. Barenie

    (Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Nashville, TN 37211, USA)

  • Alina Cernasev

    (Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Nashville, TN 37211, USA)

  • Hilary Jasmin

    (Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, Health Sciences Library, College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA)

  • Phillip Knight

    (Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Nashville, TN 37211, USA)

  • Marie Chisholm-Burns

    (School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA)

Abstract

Background: The majority of patients with a substance use disorder (SUD) in the United States do not receive evidence-based treatment. Research has also demonstrated challenges to accessing SUD care in the US criminal justice system. We conducted a systematic review of access to SUD care in the US criminal justice system. Methods: We searched for comprehensive qualitative studies in multiple databases through April 2021, and two researchers reviewed 6858 studies using pre-selected inclusion criteria. Once eligibility was determined, themes were extracted from the data. This review provides a thematic overview of the US qualitative studies to inform future research-based interventions. This review was conducted in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Results: There were 6858 unique abstract results identified for review, and seven qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria. Two themes were identified from these results: (1) managing withdrawal from medication-assisted treatment, and (2) facilitators and barriers to treatment programs in the criminal justice system. Conclusions: Qualitative research evaluating access to SUD care in the US criminal justice system varied, with some interventions reported not rooted in evidence-based medicine. An opportunity may exist to develop best practices to ensure evidence-based treatment for SUDs is delivered to patients who need it in the US criminal justice system.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel E. Barenie & Alina Cernasev & Hilary Jasmin & Phillip Knight & Marie Chisholm-Burns, 2022. "A Qualitative Systematic Review of Access to Substance Use Disorder Care in the United States Criminal Justice System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12647-:d:932640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12647/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12647/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12647-:d:932640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.