IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12642-d932566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of a State Police Academy Menu Cycle for Dietary Quality and Performance Nutrition Adequacy

Author

Listed:
  • Bryan Michael Pepito

    (Tactical Fitness and Nutrition Lab, College of Education and Human Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
    Department of Nutritional Sciences, College of Education and Human Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

  • Jay Dawes

    (Tactical Fitness and Nutrition Lab, College of Education and Human Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
    School of Kinesiology, Applied Health, and Recreation, College of Education and Human Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

  • Deana Hildebrand

    (Department of Nutritional Sciences, College of Education and Human Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

  • Jillian Joyce

    (Tactical Fitness and Nutrition Lab, College of Education and Human Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
    Department of Nutritional Sciences, College of Education and Human Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

Abstract

Law enforcement officers have high rates of overweight and obesity. With diet as a leading risk factor, training academies present an opportunity for early-career nutrition intervention. Our purpose was to determine the dietary quality (DQ) and performance nutrition adequacy of a state police academy’s cafeteria menu. This cross-sectional content analysis included six weeks (three daily meals, Monday–Friday) of a police academy menu. Nutrient content was determined by portioning menus, gathering food specifications, and performing nutrient analysis. DQ was assessed using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) 2015. Statistical analyses included independent t -tests and Cohen’s d. The total HEI score was 54/100. Subcomponent scores indicating adequacy included added sugar (5/5), total protein (4.97/5) and whole fruits (4.77/5). Seafood/plant proteins (0.33/5), fatty acid ratio (1.31/5), and dairy scores (1.59/10) needed significant improvement. The menu met the recommended intake for 13 of 19 nutrients investigated. Nutrients that did not meet adequacy were calories (% mean difference, needs-menu = 36.7%), carbohydrates (52.3%), vitamins D (82.5%) and E (66.7%), magnesium (44.1%), and potassium (41.8%). The academy menu leaves room for improvement in DQ and shortfall nutrients. By increasing low scores, the overall DQ of the menu will increase and supplement missing nutrients.

Suggested Citation

  • Bryan Michael Pepito & Jay Dawes & Deana Hildebrand & Jillian Joyce, 2022. "Analysis of a State Police Academy Menu Cycle for Dietary Quality and Performance Nutrition Adequacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-8, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12642-:d:932566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12642/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12642/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12642-:d:932566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.