IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12639-d932512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rapid Analysis of Residues of 186 Pesticides in Hawk Tea Using Modified QuEChERS Coupled with Gas Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao Shu

    (Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing 401329, China
    Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Supervision, Inspection and Testing Center, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing 401329, China)

  • Nengming Chu

    (Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing 401329, China
    Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Supervision, Inspection and Testing Center, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing 401329, China)

  • Xuemei Zhang

    (Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing 401329, China
    Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Supervision, Inspection and Testing Center, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing 401329, China)

  • Xiaoxia Yang

    (Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing 401329, China
    Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Supervision, Inspection and Testing Center, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing 401329, China)

  • Xia Meng

    (Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing 401329, China
    Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Supervision, Inspection and Testing Center, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing 401329, China)

  • Junying Yang

    (Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing 401329, China
    Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Supervision, Inspection and Testing Center, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing 401329, China)

  • Na Wang

    (Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing 401329, China
    Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Supervision, Inspection and Testing Center, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing 401329, China)

Abstract

In this work, the QuEChERS method was modified and evaluated for the determination of 186 pesticides from caffeine-free and fatty hawk tea prior to their gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry analysis for the first time. The results showed that the combination of MgSO 4 + PSA + MWCNTs plus EMR-Lipid provided the lowest matrix effect and best recovery; 117 of 186 pesticides manifested weak matrix effects. Thus, for accurate quantification, it is necessary to use matrix-matched calibration curves to compensate for the matrix effect. At the spiked level of 0.1 mg/kg, the average recoveries of 184 pesticides were in the range of 70–120% and the RSDs were 0.3–14.4% by the modified method. Good linearity was shown for 186 analytes at concentration of 0.01 mg/L~0.4 mg/L, and the correlation coefficients exceeded 0.99 for 182 pesticides. The detection limits of 186 pesticides by the modified QuEChERS method were 0.001–0.02 mg/kg, and the limits of quantification (LOQ) were 0.005 mg/kg~0.05 mg/kg. The necessity of solvent exchange is also explained in this work. The successful application of the modified QuEChERS in real samples proved that this method could be one of the routine options for analysis of herbal tea.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao Shu & Nengming Chu & Xuemei Zhang & Xiaoxia Yang & Xia Meng & Junying Yang & Na Wang, 2022. "Rapid Analysis of Residues of 186 Pesticides in Hawk Tea Using Modified QuEChERS Coupled with Gas Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12639-:d:932512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12639/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12639/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12639-:d:932512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.