IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12627-d932407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National Survey: How Do We Approach the Patient at Risk of Clinical Deterioration outside the ICU in the Spanish Context?

Author

Listed:
  • Álvaro Clemente Vivancos

    (Health Sciences Doctoral Program, Universidad Católica de Murcia (UCAM), 30107 Murcia, Spain
    Advanced Nursing Practice, Hospital del Mar, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
    IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), 08003 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Esther León Castelao

    (Simulation Laboratory, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
    Clinical Simulation Lab, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Álvaro Castellanos Ortega

    (Intensive Care Unit Medical Director, University Hospital La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
    Associate Lecturer, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Maria Bodi Saera

    (Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Joan XIII, 43005 Tarragona, Spain
    Pere I Virgili Health Research Institute, Rovira I Virgili University, 43003 Tarragona, Spain
    Center for Biomedical Research in Respiratory Diseases Network (CIEBERES), Carlos III Health Institute, 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • Federico Gordo Vidal

    (Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Henares, 28822 Madrid, Spain
    Critical Pathology Research Group, Francisco de Vitoria University, 28223 Madrid, Spain)

  • Maria Cruz Martin Delgado

    (Intensive Care Unit, Hospital 12th of October, 28041 Madrid, Spain
    Facultad de Medicina, Francisco de Vitoria University, 28223 Madrid, Spain)

  • Cristina Jorge-Soto

    (CLINURSID Research Group, Psychiatry, Radiology, Public Health, Nursing and Medicine Department, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15705 Galicia, Spain
    Simulation and Intensive Care Unit of Santiago (SICRUS) Research Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela-CHUS, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
    Faculty of Nursing, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • Felipe Fernandez Mendez

    (School of Nursing, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Pontevedra, Spain
    REMOSS Research Group, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Pontevedra, Spain)

  • Jose Carlos Igeño Cano

    (Intensive Care Unit, San Juan de Dios Hospital, 14012 Cordoba, Spain)

  • Josep Trenado Alvarez

    (Intensive Care and High Dependency Unit, Mutua Terrassa Hospital, 08221 Terrasa, Spain
    Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Jesus Caballero Lopez

    (Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, 25198 Lleida, Spain
    IRBLleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain)

  • Manuel Jose Parraga Ramirez

    (Intensive Care Unit, JM Morales Meseguer, 30008 Murcia, Spain
    Simulation and Clinical Skills Director, UCAM, 30107 Murcia, Spain
    Medical Degree Direction Team, UCAM, 30107 Murcia, Spain)

Abstract

Background: Anticipating and avoiding preventable intrahospital cardiac arrest and clinical deterioration are important priorities for international healthcare systems and institutions. One of the internationally followed strategies to improve this matter is the introduction of the Rapid Response Systems (RRS). Although there is vast evidence from the international community, the evidence reported in a Spanish context is scarce. Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional research consisting of a voluntary 31-question online survey was performed. The Spanish Society of Intensive, Critical and Coronary Care Medicine (SEMICYUC) supported the research. Results: We received 62 fully completed surveys distributed within 13 of the 17 regions and two autonomous cities of Spain. Thirty-two of the participants had an established Rapid Response Team (RRT). Common frequency on measuring vital signs was at least once per shift but other frequencies were contemplated (48.4%), usually based on professional criteria (69.4%), as only 12 (19.4%) centers used Early Warning Scores (EWS) or automated alarms on abnormal parameters. In the sample, doctors, nurses (55%), and other healthcare professionals (39%) could activate the RRT via telephone, but only 11.3% of the sample enacted this at early signs of deterioration. The responders on the RRT are the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), doctors, and nurses, who are available 24/7 most of the time. Concerning the education and training of general ward staff and RRT members, this varies from basic to advanced and specific-specialized level, simulating a growing educational methodology among participants. A great number of participants have emergency resuscitation equipment (drugs, airway adjuncts, and defibrillators) in their general wards. In terms of quality improvement, only half of the sample registered RRT activity indicators. In terms of the use of communication and teamwork techniques, the most used is clinical debriefing in 29 centers. Conclusions: In terms of the concept of RRS, we found in our context that we are in the early stages of the establishment process, as it is not yet a generalized concept in most of our hospitals. The centers that have it are in still in the process of maturing the system and adapting themselves to our context.

Suggested Citation

  • Álvaro Clemente Vivancos & Esther León Castelao & Álvaro Castellanos Ortega & Maria Bodi Saera & Federico Gordo Vidal & Maria Cruz Martin Delgado & Cristina Jorge-Soto & Felipe Fernandez Mendez & Jose, 2022. "National Survey: How Do We Approach the Patient at Risk of Clinical Deterioration outside the ICU in the Spanish Context?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12627-:d:932407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12627/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12627/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12627-:d:932407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.