IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12221-d926156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact on Prevalence of the Application of NAFLD/MAFLD Criteria in Overweight and Normal Weight Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Luisa Ordoñez-Vázquez

    (Gastroenterology and Obesity Unit, Medica Sur Clinic & Foundation, Mexico City 14050, Mexico
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Eva Juárez-Hernández

    (Translational Research Unit, Medica Sur Clinic & Foundation, Mexico City 14050, Mexico
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Julia María Zuarth-Vázquez

    (Internal Medicine Unit, Medica Sur Clinic & Foundation, Mexico City 14050, Mexico)

  • Martha Helena Ramos-Ostos

    (Diagnosis and Treatment Unit, Medica Sur Clinic & Foundation, Mexico City 14050, Mexico)

  • Misael Uribe

    (Gastroenterology and Obesity Unit, Medica Sur Clinic & Foundation, Mexico City 14050, Mexico)

  • Graciela Castro-Narro

    (Transplants and Hepatology Unit, Medica Sur Clinic & Foundation, Mexico City 14050, Mexico)

  • Iván López-Méndez

    (Transplants and Hepatology Unit, Medica Sur Clinic & Foundation, Mexico City 14050, Mexico)

Abstract

Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome. Recently, the term metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has been proposed and adapted to body mass index (BMI). This study describes the impact on prevalence of the application of both criteria in overweight and lean patients. Methods: Patients who were evaluated for liver steatosis by transient elastography were included and divided according to BMI (≥25 kg/m 2 and <25 kg/m 2 ) and classified as NAFLD or MAFLD, according to metabolic abnormalities. Differences in prevalence were evaluated applying both criteria. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate independent associations of metabolic abnormalities and liver steatosis in lean patients. Results: 3847 patients were included. In overweight patients (61%), the prevalence NAFLD was 63.6% and 65.3% for MAFLD ( p = 0.22). In contrast, the prevalence of MAFLD was lower (7.9% vs. 18.3%, p ≤ 0.001) in lean patients. In this group, higher age, fasting glucose, triglycerides, and waist circumference showed independent association with liver steatosis. Conclusion: The application of NAFLD/MAFLD criteria did not show prevalence differences in overweight patients. With MAFLD criteria, the prevalence is lower in lean patients, but patients with high risk of progression of liver disease for steatosis were identified, according to their metabolic abnormalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Luisa Ordoñez-Vázquez & Eva Juárez-Hernández & Julia María Zuarth-Vázquez & Martha Helena Ramos-Ostos & Misael Uribe & Graciela Castro-Narro & Iván López-Méndez, 2022. "Impact on Prevalence of the Application of NAFLD/MAFLD Criteria in Overweight and Normal Weight Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-10, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12221-:d:926156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12221/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12221/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12221-:d:926156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.