IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12082-d924100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Good Practices on Endoscope Reprocessing in Italy: Findings of a Nationwide Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Michela Scarpaci

    (Department of Translational Research, N.T.M.C. University of Pisa, Via S. Zeno 35-37, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

  • Tommaso Cosci

    (Department of Translational Research, N.T.M.C. University of Pisa, Via S. Zeno 35-37, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

  • Benedetta Tuvo

    (Department of Translational Research, N.T.M.C. University of Pisa, Via S. Zeno 35-37, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

  • Alessandra Guarini

    (Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, ‘Nuovo Regina Margherita’ Hospital, 00153 Rome, Italy)

  • Teresa Iannone

    (Gastroenterology Unit, ‘Polistena’ Hospital, 89024 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Angelo Zullo

    (Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, ‘Nuovo Regina Margherita’ Hospital, 00153 Rome, Italy)

  • Beatrice Casini

    (Department of Translational Research, N.T.M.C. University of Pisa, Via S. Zeno 35-37, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

Abstract

Background : Correct reprocessing and microbiological surveillance on endoscopes are fundamental for preventing the transmission of multi-drug resistant strains and device-related infections. Methods : A questionnaire with three domains was created: (1) centre characteristics; (2) endoscope reprocessing procedures; and (3) application of microbiological surveillance. Nurses working in endoscopic units across Italy were invited to anonymously fill out the questionnaire on the SurveyMonkey platform between November 2021 and February 2022. Results : A total of 82 out of 132 endoscopic centres participated in the survey, with at least one centre from each Italian region. Data found different concerns regarding the current practice of both reprocessing and microbiological surveillance. According to respondents, the training on reprocessing was performed through theoretical training and only in 10% of centres; the microbiological surveillance was regularly performed in 59% of centres; and sampled endoscopes were not excluded for use in 31% of centres performing the surveillance until the outcome was pending, and when positive, 72% maintained them in quarantine until a successive negative result. Conclusions : Reprocessing and microbiological surveillance currently present several criticisms along the endoscopic centres in Italy. Our survey highlights the need for the correct application of the national recommendations in each endoscopic centre to prevent the potential transmission of endoscope-related infections.

Suggested Citation

  • Michela Scarpaci & Tommaso Cosci & Benedetta Tuvo & Alessandra Guarini & Teresa Iannone & Angelo Zullo & Beatrice Casini, 2022. "Good Practices on Endoscope Reprocessing in Italy: Findings of a Nationwide Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-8, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12082-:d:924100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12082/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12082/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12082-:d:924100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.