IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p11905-d920355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of an Assessment of Ethics for Chinese Physical Education Teachers: A Study Using the Delphi and Expert Ranking Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Haohui Liu

    (College of Physical Education and Health, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)

  • Zhihua Yin

    (College of Physical Education and Health, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
    Sports Postdoctoral Mobile Station, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Sitong Chen

    (Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne 8001, Australia)

  • Youcai Yang

    (College of Physical Education and Health, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)

  • Hengxing Tian

    (China Basketball College, Beijing Sports University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

Background: Developing the ethics of physical education (PE) teachers is important for promoting the overall development of students. However, it is unclear which indicators can be used to assess the ethics of PE teachers in China. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an assessment of ethics for Chinese physical education teachers (AECPET) using the Delphi and expert ranking methods. Methods: Two rounds of the Delphi method were performed to develop the assessment. An expert ranking method was used to determine the weight of each domain and indicator. Results: The developed AECPET is a multi-dimensional model with eight domains: (1) Policy Implementation (PI), (2) Legal Compliance and Patriotism (LCP), (3) Love for Students (LS), (4) Daily Performance (DP), (5) Philosophy of Educating Students (PES), (6) Attitude towards Scientific Research (ASR), (7) Awareness of Self-discipline and Honesty (ASH), and (8) Attitude towards Serving Society (ASS); and 42 indicators. The weight of PI, LCP, LS, DP, PES, ASR, ASH, and ASS are 18.1%, 19.1%, 16.2%, 11.1%, 16.3%, 7.2%, 9.1%, and 4.6%, respectively. Conclusions: The AECPET is an evaluating system constructed based on the perspective of Chinese PE teachers, which also has a potentially global perspective and can be used by PE teachers with different cultural views. Applied by the government, schools, PE teachers, and students, the AECPET can improve the level of ethics of Chinese PE teachers.

Suggested Citation

  • Haohui Liu & Zhihua Yin & Sitong Chen & Youcai Yang & Hengxing Tian, 2022. "Development of an Assessment of Ethics for Chinese Physical Education Teachers: A Study Using the Delphi and Expert Ranking Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:11905-:d:920355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/11905/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/11905/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:11905-:d:920355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.