IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11751-d917704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unseen Threats of Chronic Diseases among the Middle-Aged: Examining the Feasibility of Well-Defined Healthcare Vouchers in Encouraging Uptake of General Checkups

Author

Listed:
  • Jasen Kin-Fung Leung

    (JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Martin Chi-Sang Wong

    (JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
    Centre for Health Education and Health Promotion, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Eliza Lai-Yi Wong

    (JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
    Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China)

Abstract

Background: The ageing population and the emergence of chronic diseases continue to pose immense challenges to the healthcare system. This study aims to explore how likely middle-aged citizens could be encouraged to attend health checkups by well-defined healthcare vouchers, and to explore potential factors associated with the uptake of health checkups. Methods: A cross-sectional survey with self-administered structured questionnaires was conducted among Hong Kong residents aged 45–59. The questionnaire consisted of 25 items, including attitudes toward healthcare vouchers and checkups, utilisation patterns of healthcare services, and socio-demographics. Results: We received 278 responses between June and September 2021. Among the study participants, 62.6% (174) attended regular checkups currently, and a total of 252 (90.6%) indicated that it was likely for them to undertake health checkups with well-defined vouchers. This proportion showed an increase of 44.8% after introducing vouchers (78 of 174) when compared with the proportion currently attending regular health checkups. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the perceived barrier of health checkup uptake included financial cost (AOR 0.367, 95% CI 0.162–0.832, p = 0.016), whilst the government’s recommendation (AOR 1.685, 95% CI 1.052–2.698, p = 0.030) and full support by the employer-purchased insurance (AOR 2.395, 95% CI 1.036–5.523, p = 0.041) were positively associated with uptakes. Conclusions: Financial cost is a significant barrier to health promotion and disease prevention. Well-defined vouchers, as a demand-side financial tool, were widely accepted by our participants as incentives to undergo health checkups. Our findings indicate that the voucher scheme could be extended to individuals aged 45–59 for health checkups by easing the financial barrier, and show the importance of involving government recommendations and employer-purchased insurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasen Kin-Fung Leung & Martin Chi-Sang Wong & Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, 2022. "Unseen Threats of Chronic Diseases among the Middle-Aged: Examining the Feasibility of Well-Defined Healthcare Vouchers in Encouraging Uptake of General Checkups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-11, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11751-:d:917704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11751/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11751/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hiroshi Murayama & Yuta Takahashi & Setaro Shimada, 2021. "Effectiveness of an Out-of-Pocket Cost Removal Intervention on Health Check Attendance in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-11, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11751-:d:917704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.